Politics

Scandal of the Secret Plan Against Trump, Political Destabilization and Fears for Kamala

Julio M. Shiling on the turbulent political situation in the United States, including the recent assassination attempt against Donald Trump and the implications for democracy in an interview with Venezuelan researcher and political scientist Maibort Petit.

In this interview, political scientist and writer Julio M. Shiling delves into recent political events in the United States, addressing the assassination attempt against Donald Trump and the implications of the Biden administration. His analysis offers a critical vision of the current state of violations of democracy and the political persecution against Donald Trump that has created political turbulence and an increase in distrust towards government security and justice organizations in the United States, which have adopted characteristics typical of the banana governments and totalitarian dictatorships of Latin America.

Table of Contents

• How would you describe the current political situation in Washington?
• What is your opinion on the attempted assassination against Donald Trump?
• What role does the left play in this context?
• Who does he consider to be responsible for this situation?
• What is his analysis of secret service negligence?
• How were security communications managed during the event?
• What evidence is there about the attacker and the relationship of him with the secret service?
• How has accountability-changed-in-the-US-government?
• What implications does lack of accountability have for democracy?
• What do you think about the influence of the media communication in current politics?
• How do you assess President Biden's capabilities in your term?
• What do you think about Kamala Harris' candidacy?
• How does the current administration affect international relations, especially with Israel?
• What changes do you anticipate in the immediate future of US politics?

How would you describe the current political situation in Washington?

The political situation in Washington is extremely chaotic and confusing. There is much concern among citizens about the coherence of the government's actions and statements. 

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

Amendment 25: What Are Democrats Waiting for To Remove Biden From the White House? America Is Still in the Hands of a Madman

Leer en Español

If Biden cannot run for president because of his mental problems, he should not continue as president. If he does not resign, the vice president should invoke the 25th amendment, to force his resignation and ensure the security and stability of the United States.

Instead of partisan political opinions about Biden's proven mental incapacity, a balanced solution needs to be adopted and the potential evil nipped in the bud before he can commit any folly using the power he still wields.

Despite the sensitivity of the issue at hand, I express my humble opinion with the arguments that have led me to write this article, remaining open to debate, criticism, and rectification of my comments if I am shown to be wrong in my analysis.

Debate on President Biden’s Ability To Govern

Introduction:

Current Context of the Presidency

- The current context of Joe Biden's presidency

- Growing debate over his fitness for office

Joe Biden's presidency has been under intense scrutiny since its inception in 2021. As his term has progressed, there has been a growing debate about his fitness for office, centered primarily on concerns about his age and mental health. This debate has gained prominence not only in the political arena but also in public opinion, raising questions about the future leadership of the United States and the security and stability of the nation.

I. Concerns About the President’s Mental Health

A. Public incidents that have raised doubts. Throughout his presidency, Biden has had several moments that have raised serious concerns about his mental state. These include confusion in speeches, difficulty remembering names or dates, and occasional verbal stumbles during interviews and press conferences.

B. Opinions of medical experts Some health professionals have expressed concerns about signs of cognitive decline that the president may be experiencing. However, others want to cover up the sun with a finger with arguments more incongruous than Biden's affectations by saying that these incidents are not necessarily indicative of serious problems and can be attributed to the pressure of office or Biden's long-standing stutter.

C. Impact on public perception These events have had a significant effect on public perception. Recent polls suggest that a growing number of Americans, including some Democrats, question Biden's ability to effectively lead the country to the end of his term in office. 

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

II. Implications for the Upcoming Elections

A. Biden, 81, withdrew from the presidential campaign in the face of growing doubts about his physical and mental capacity, following a disastrous debate with Trump in which he demonstrated the severity of his mental problems that encouraged Democratic Party colleagues, donors, and others to press him to abandon his re-election aspirations. Although Biden had expressed his intention to seek re-election, the debate over his fitness and uncertainty generated discussions within the Democratic Party about possible alternatives for a new candidate that could revitalize the campaign but also divide the party within its ranks.

B. Logically, the reactions of the Republican opposition took advantage of this situation to question Biden's leadership capacity, the stability of his administration and the divisions within the Democrats to reinforce their strategy and show their unity for the upcoming elections at the Republican National Convention.

III. The 25th Amendment and Its Possible Implementation

A. Explanation of Amendment 25: Amendment 25 of the US Constitution sets out the procedure for replacing the president in the event of incapacity. Section 4 allows the vice president and a majority of the cabinet to declare the president unable to perform his duties.

B. Historical precedent: Although Section 4 has never been invoked to permanently remove a president, sections of the 25th Amendment have been used temporarily, such as when presidents underwent medical procedures.

C. Barriers to implementation: Invoking Section 4 would be a drastic step with significant political implications. It would require a consensus among the vice president, the cabinet, and potentially Congress, making it difficult to implement if the parties involved do not agree, ignoring that there is clear and incontrovertible evidence of the president's mental incapacity.

IV. The Role of Vice-President Kamala Harris

A. Her current position in the administration As Vice President. Harris has taken on extremist roles in the Biden administration, leading initiatives in areas such as immigration, abortion, and voting rights. Her performance in these roles has been abysmal on immigration, many remember when in 2019 Kamala Harris said she would not treat illegal immigrants as criminals, female extremism, and abortionists without restraint, as well as creating chaos on her voting rights and abortion policy without time limits, for which she has come under scrutiny, debate and criticism from both sides of the political spectrum.

B. Potential scenarios should she assume the presidency. If Harris were to assume the presidency, either through Amendment 25 or Biden's resignation, she would become the first woman and person of color to hold the office. This could have significant implications for American politics and society given her position of feminist extremism, her incapacity, and her unfamiliarity with key issues in US domestic and international politics.

C. Increasing housing and food prices. Throughout the last few years, she has been a staunch supporter of Biden's open borders and environmental deception policies that have resulted in uncontrollable price increases for housing and food.

D. Political implications of a leadership change. A mid-term leadership change could have important consequences for the administration's policy agenda and the dynamics of the Democratic Party going into the next election.

E. Credibility and honesty questioned. His credibility and honesty have been criticized because he helped Biden cover up his declining health while in office.

V. Impact on National Stability and Security

A. Concerns about crisis decision-making. Doubts about the president's mental capacity have led to concerns about how he could handle crisis situations that require quick and complex decisions such as ordering a nuclear strike without having to rely on anyone.

B. International relations and diplomacy. Biden's perceived weak or unstable leadership and mental incapacity have affected the US position on the global stage, influencing relations with allies and adversaries alike. Under his tenure Putin invaded Ukraine, Hamas attacked Israel, China threatens to invade Taiwan, and Iran will achieve nuclear weapons capability in a matter of weeks.

C. Public confidence in government. The progressive deterioration of the President's mental capacity has eroded public confidence in the government, potentially affecting the political and social stability of the country, which increasingly distrusts President Biden's ability to lead the United States and the world.

Conclusion:

President Biden's fitness to govern raises fundamental questions about leadership and governance in the United States that are crucial to the security and stability of the country. What is clear is that as long as the clock continues to tick to reach a consensus among the vice president, the cabinet, and potentially Congress to remove the president, Biden will remain an enormous danger to the security and stability of the country and the world. The agony of the United States being governed by a mentally unfit person must be ended now, taking into account the welfare of the country above political and partisan interests.

How long will this agony last?

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

Attack on Trump: Failure of Security, Negligence or Possible Complicity?

Leer en Español

The attack on Donald Trump on 13 July has unleashed a torrent of questions about the role and responsibilities of the Secret Service ranging from security lapses or negligence to possible complicity in the attempted assassination of the former president. In this article, we examine the theories surrounding the incident and the critical lapses that have emerged in the former president's security.

Table of Contents

• Introduction to the Assassination Attempt
• Complicity Theory
• Secret Service Responsibility
• Identified Security Errors
• Inadequate Access to Critical Areas
• Surveillance and Monitoring Failures
• Late Secret Service Response
• Weapons Detection and Suspicious Behaviour
• Denial of Security Requests
• Negligence at Security Positions
• Lack of Training and Deficient Staffing
• Lack of Transparency and Communication
• Conclusions on the Security Plan

Introduction to the Attack

The attack on Donald Trump has given rise to various theories about its execution and the possible complicity involved. According to reports, the attack was carried out by Thomas Matthew Crooks, a 20-year-old at a public campaign event at the Butler Farm Show in Butler, Pennsylvania.

The Complicity Theory

One of the most hotly debated theories suggests that there was complicity on the part of the Secret Service. This idea has gained traction because of the following questions:

Why did the Secret Service agents protecting Trump fail to act if they saw Trump's attacker 20 minutes before he fired?

Also if the Secret Service identified the shooter 62 minutes before he started shooting at the president as a person of interest, someone who was acting suspiciously, How is it possible that the attack on the president could not have been prevented?

Cheatle, a veteran Secret Service agent, has called the security failure at the rally on July 13 unacceptable, as a gunman was allowed to fire from an unsecured roof around 150 yards from where Trump addressed the crowd. The gunman spotted acting suspiciously before Trump began speaking but the Secret Service did not intervene or prevent Trump from taking the stage.

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

From Teddy Roosevelt to Donald Trump, Something More Than a Shot To Kill a Moose

Leer en Español

Butler, Pennsylvania, at dusk this Saturday afternoon, July 13, Donald Trump is shot and wounded, minutes after beginning his speech to a crowd of supporters at an electoral meeting. The shots killed one person, seriously injured another, while the attacker was killed, thus avoiding worse consequences.

Milwaukee, October 14, 1912, presidential candidate Theodore Roosevelt is shot in the chest as he was on his way to the stage where thousands of supporters were waiting for him.

On that fateful day, just over a century ago, the leader of the celebrated Rough Riders, said:

"Folks, I'm going to ask you to be as quiet as you can. I don't know if you guys know I've been wounded, but it takes more than that to kill a moose."

Donald Trump, his face bloodied, raises his fist in the air, and shakes it several times before being forcibly removed from the podium. Once again, he was accompanied by that astonishing energy that has allowed him to advance during an ongoing judicial persecution, while mobilizing millions of supporters in rallies unprecedented in the electoral campaigns of the present century.

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

That image will be worth millions of words, equivalent to votes, from now until November 5, when the final act of the reality show that is this electoral contest will be consummated, where, as we have just seen, without a doubt, even life is at stake.

Formally, with greater or lesser sincerity, the condemnation of the facts is unanimous.

Teddy Roosevelt, shot by an anarchist fanatic who did not want him as president, refused to be assisted by doctors, delivering a speech immediately after the attack. He fell to the ground exhausted along with his last words. He survived 7 more years with lead as a witness in his body.

The president of the Big Stick went down in history, among many other feats and legacies, for being the only U.S. president with a medal of valor, awarded by the U.S. Congress, in memory of his courage in leading his men in a cavalry assault against the Spanish trenches during the battle of Loma de San Juan, Santiago de Cuba, fighting for freedom on July 1, 1898.

Like no other executive in the White House, during the Castro's 65 years of totalitarian communist dictatorship, the resident in Mar a Lago has stood with Cubans in the struggle for freedom. His commitment went so far as to sign Chapter III of the Helms Burton Act. Revolution Square breathed a sigh of relief when an appeaser named Joe Biden took up residence in Washington.

Freedom fighters will know how to choose.

Energy is a distinctive trait of leaders. Courage and determination accompany them.

The people of the United States will decide in free elections who will be their next president.

Author Vicente Morin Aguado. Cuban independent journalist, professor of history and philosophy, and contributor to the digital media Havana Times, Diario de Cuba, Cubanet, Palabra Nueva, and other media. He currently lives in the United States.

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html