Politics

Biden-Kamala Regime Authorizes Use of Lethal Force Against Political Opponents

Leer en Español

The Biden-Kamala regime's Directive 5240.01 authorizes the use of deadly force against political opponents with Trump in the Crosshair.

The passage of Directive 5240.01 on 9/27/24 by the Biden-Kamala administration in collusion with the Department of Defense represents a dangerous and brazen escalation against American democracy 6 weeks before the presidential election, by allowing the use of lethal force against political opponents and Donald Trump in the crosshairs:

The Democratic Regime Is Declaring War on Dissent and Opposition

This change in leadership comes in the face of Kamala's imminent defeat in the presidential election, which allows the use of lethal force against her political opponent Donald Trump and his supporters, effectively turning law enforcement and federal agencies into a political weapon to stay in power.

This directive undermines the rule of law and threatens the very foundations of democracy in the United States. It sets a dangerous precedent that will reaffirm and justify the power of the democratic regime in its use of new attacks on civil liberties and human rights and be able to lead the United States to a neo-Marxist dictatorial regime that began with Obama and has continued in his third term with the Biden-Harris administration, which intends to consecrate a fourth Obama term with the handpicked of Kamala Harris as a pretender to the presidency. (The American Díaz-Canel as Jorge Díaz-Díaz says).

This measure in the middle of the presidential election campaign and the hate speech full of lies against Trump promoted by Kamala and promoted by Biden is a call to eliminate Trump at any cost, including his physical elimination.

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

Americans Wake Up! Socialism Is at the White House Door!

Leer en Español

The US Democratic Party has long been regarded as a ‘progressive’ political force that has veered to the neo-Marxist far left by promoting villas and castles to Americans to woo their votes and implement a socialist regime.

They have successfully used neo-Marxist indoctrination to adapt to contemporary society, which emphasizes class struggle, systematic oppression, and the need for revolutionary change through the deceptive propaganda of principles of ‘equality’ and ‘social justice’ that have failed in every country where the original doctrines or modifications of Marxism have been implemented. Incredibly, this ideology of failure has gained popularity in the United States thanks to the ignorance of a part of the electorate that is taking the red bait with siren songs and the radical left of the Democratic Party, which has adopted communist premises in its political platform.

1 Objectives of the Neo-Marxist Indoctrination in the Democratic Party

1.1 Developing ‘Diversity’, ‘Equity’ and ‘Inclusion’ of Gender and Racial Identity

One of the fundamental objectives of neo-Marxist indoctrination in the Democratic Party is the destruction of cultural pillars such as the family, organized religion, and control of law and media as a strategy to establish cultural hegemony by promoting gender and racial identity as determinants of social inequality. In the name of equality and justice proclaimed by neo-Marxists to address systemic discrimination, policies and programs to promote diversity and inclusion are creating a new kind of discrimination against white and male individuals, who are seen as beneficiaries of historical privilege. Affirmative action and similar programs argue that these policies create reverse discrimination and perpetuate divisions between different social groups.

In addition to these concerns, there is also the question of whether preferential treatment addresses the root causes of systemic discrimination or is pure rhetoric to justify neo-Marxist policies. While it is essential to provide opportunities for historically marginalized groups, policies that discriminate against other groups are being promoted to maintain control and manipulate society in a socialist direction.

1.2 Develop the Policy of Cancelling Out Dissenting Voices Including Persecution and Arrest.

In addition, neo-Marxist indoctrination in the Democratic party has promoted the cancellation of dissenting voices that deviate from the narrative of oppression and class struggle. Those who openly criticize identity politics and social justice have been convicted as racist, sexist, or xenophobic, including the persecution and arrest of anyone who opposes their ideology or who does not share the left's vision without allowing open and respectful debate on these issues.

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

1.3 Raising Taxes on the Rich and Big Corporations to Fund Their Plans

Another aspect of the neo-Marxist indoctrination in the Democratic party is its focus on the redistribution of wealth through a system of progressive taxation and expanded welfare programs. It has advocated increased taxes on the rich and large corporations to fund education, health, and housing programs for the underprivileged, under the guise of combating economic inequality to maintain its plans to control society by making citizens dependent on the socialist government.

1.4 Consequences of Neo-Marxist Policies

The neo-Marxist policies of the Democratic party hurt the economy, discouraging investment and job creation, and creating a culture of dependence on the government instead of fostering independence and social mobility for citizens.

Moreover, neo-Marxist indoctrination in the Democratic Party has led to political polarization and increased division in US society. Incendiary rhetoric and demonization of those not adhering to the dominant ideology have exacerbated tensions and made constructive dialogue between political factions more difficult.

Ultimately, it is important to recognize that the neo-Marxist indoctrination in the Democratic Party has affected most of its members who have been hijacked and indoctrinated by the extreme socialist left that now controls and leads the Democratic Party. Only a few democrats continue to advocate traditional principles of social justice and equity without resorting to the ideological radicalization of petty socialism.

In conclusion, neo-Marxist indoctrination has left a significant mark that has destroyed not only the traditional Democratic Party but the existential roots of American society, which for years was the democratic bastion of the civilized world that maintained a balance of power and competition between parties of different ideological strands.

2 Arguments for the Socialist Turn of the Democratic Party

The Democratic Party has already implemented some of the neo-Marxist policies it intends to implement as an oppressive regime in the country associated with policies that undermine individual liberties and create a climate of repression in the American nation.

One of the main concerns is the tendency of the Democratic Party to promote policies that increase the power of government and reduce the autonomy of citizens. For example, proposals such as increased regulation of the economy, and greater government control over education and health care could lead to a more intrusive and authoritarian government under the guise of expanding the ‘welfare state’.

2.1 Restriction of Free Speech in the Name of ‘Political Correctness’ and Protection of Minorities

Furthermore, the Democratic party has demonstrated its ability to restrict freedom of speech in the name of ‘political correctness’ and the protection of minorities. While it is important to protect the rights and dignity of all citizens, these measures have been used to censor dissenting political and scientific opinions, as in the case of COVID and climate change, and to limit any public debate that goes against their ideology, destroying democracy and pluralism.

2.2 Restricting and Controlling the Right To Bear Arms

Another concern is the Democratic Party's stance on the right to bear arms, a fundamental issue for many Americans who see gun ownership as a symbol of freedom and self-defense. The party has advocated tighter restrictions on gun ownership, which could undermine the constitutional right of citizens to defend themselves and their families.

2.3 Control, Surveillance, and Repression of Political Dissent

In addition, the Democratic party has cracked down on its political opponents by using federal institutions such as the FBI, CIA, and DOJ as political police and armed wing that started with the fake Russia dossier against Donald Trump with the Obama regime, continued with the political prisoners on January 6, the indictments and trials of Trump under the Biden-Kamala regime, to eliminate him from the presidential race, and population control, such as the use of surveillance cameras and mass collection of personal data, under the pretext of ensuring national security and preventing crime. However, these policies have violated citizens' privacy and provoked a surveillance state to suppress political dissent.

2.4 Open Borders, Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants, and Id-Free Voting

Another cause for concern is the Democratic party's stance on uncontrolled immigration, which has maintained a policy of open borders and ID-free voting to obtain votes even from illegals, proposing amnesty for the millions of undocumented immigrants including mass legalization of totally uncontrolled immigration of their own making, which has welcomed criminals, drug and human traffickers, and spies who have infiltrated along with immigrants seeking more favorable opportunities for their lives and families.

While it is important to address the situation of undocumented immigrants in a humanitarian manner and a comprehensive solution, these policies have negative and disastrous consequences for national security and social cohesion, creating tensions and conflicts in society due to increased crime and criminal acts, as well as the countless social, economic and employment benefits that many of them are already receiving in so-called sanctuary cities and are causing job losses for American workers, due to the low wages that employers can pay immigrants.

2.5 Connection to Radical Groups and Extremist Movements That Promote Violence and Hatred

In addition, the Democratic Party has maintained connections with radical groups and extremist movements that promote violence and hatred within the United States and against our main ally Israel, and on behalf of the Palestinians. Democratic leaders have supported groups such as Antifa and Black Lives Matter, which have provoked riots, looting of businesses, arson, physical assaults, and acts of extreme violence in the streets such as in Kenosha, Wisconsin, which was devastated by BLM demonstrations, as well as calls for measures and laws to defund the police that endanger the security and social stability of the United States.

Overall, there is growing concern that the Democratic party, in its eagerness to promote a progressive and socialist agenda, may implement an oppressive regime in the United States that limits individual liberties and undermines democracy. Citizens need to be vigilant keep their eyes open to these trends and stand firm in defense of democratic values, Judeo-Christian rights, and constitutional rights, to prevent the country from falling into tyranny and socialist repression.

Americans wake up!Socialism is at the door of the White House, with one foot in and one foot out.We still have time to stop it. Vote for Trump and MAGA!

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

Kamala Harris: Controversial Alliance With Islamic Terrorism and Illegal Immigration

Leer en español

Harris' controversial alliance with the National Iranian American Council

Kamala Harris has been a chameleon-like figure in US politics, from California senator to US vice president and now dangerously aspiring president. Her relationship with and expressed support for the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a group with ties to the Iranian regime, is more than enough to make one distrust her loyalty to US interests.

If intelligence chiefs have not ordered an investigation into Kamala's relations with Iran, it is because they are in a shameful collusion that has lasted from Obama's presidency into his third term, where he now wields his power behind the scenes.

Harris’s Suspicious Stance on Islamic Terrorism

One of the main problem indicators to distrust Kamala Harris is her views on terrorism, especially Islamic terrorism. Harris promotes and defends presumptions and concepts that could classify her as at least sympathetic to Islamic terrorism, most recently her assessment of the term Islamic terrorism, which she seeks to eliminate by blatantly manipulating the concept:

At a rally at the Islamic Center of Southern California, Harris said that the term Islamic terrorism should not be used because it puts all Muslims in an unfair position.

While not all Muslims are terrorists, many want to implement Sharia law and eliminate the Judeo-Christian religion and all those who do not convert to Islam, so ignoring the role of radical Islam by manipulating language in terrorist attacks makes it difficult to effectively combat the radical extremism of Islamic terrorists.

‘Tulsi Gabbard: How can we trust Kamala Harris to keep us safe from the threat of Islamist terrorism when she refuses to even identify that Islamist terrorism is the threat?’

Harris’ Covert Support for Hamas and Iran Against Israel 

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

Kamala’s instability, weakness, and/or chameleon-like incompetence have raised the suspicions of many who see her statements of support for anti-Israel protesters not just as a simple way to appease the demands of her party’s radical left, but as a position of covert support for Hamas and Iran, which funds the terrorist organization and protests against Israel.

Harris has said she "will not remain silent" in the face of the suffering in Gaza and has called on Netanyahu to finalize a ceasefire agreement.

She has also declared that "the suffering of the Palestinians in Gaza must end so that the Palestinian people can exercise their right to freedom, dignity and self-determination."

Iran’s preference for Comrade Kamala in the race for the US presidency is notable:

The FBI announced that Iran had allegedly been plotting to kill Trump and had hacked and stolen confidential information from the Trump campaign.

“It’s no wonder that Iran desperately wants Kamala Harris to be president because they know that as long as she is in power, they can take advantage of the United States,” Trump said. “That’s why they have tried to attack me.”

In August, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency issued a statement identifying:

“Increasingly aggressive Iranian activity during this election cycle, specifically including influence operations targeting the American public and cyber operations targeting presidential campaigns.”

“This includes recently reported activities to compromise former President Trump’s campaign,” the statement added, “which the Intelligence Community attributes to Iran.”

Immigration Controversy. Harris and Open Borders

Another hot-button issue surrounding Kamala Harris's left-wing extremism is her stance on immigration. She has said she favors legalizing border crossing without a permit, which means she wants open borders that allow in all kinds of illegals, destroying all border security measures and keeping the country unsafe and without the rules necessary for orderly immigration. Letting anyone in, as she and Biden did, has already led to increased crime, increased drug trafficking, and a threat to public safety and the country.

Allowing anyone in, as she and Biden did, has already led to increased crime, increased drug trafficking, and a threat to public safety and the country, as well as a disastrous impact on the country’s social welfare system and increased costs for housing and basic consumer services.

Undocumented immigrants’ access to social welfare programs, such as health insurance, food stamps, free housing, and other economic benefits, has led to a massive increase in the financial burden on the federal government, local governments, and taxpayers.

Harris Changes Her Immigration Policy From Stick to Rumba Melody

Kamala, in a desperate bid for votes, has deceptively reversed the disaster of her immigration policy and now pretends to fix the immigration crisis she herself caused.

Harris Belatedly Proposes Tougher Border Measures

Last Friday, 27 September, Vice President Harris proposed keeping the border closed between ports of entry to stop illegal border crossings, following an order given by President Joe Biden in June.

In a U-Turn, She Proposes Penalties and Restrictions on Illegal Crossings

Harris also promises stiffer penalties for illegal border crossers and a ban on asylum seekers.

Harris said she would renew her push for comprehensive border legislation to toughen immigration to the United States and vowed to ‘enforce’ laws against border crossers. ‘We have laws that need to be enforced and enforced, that address and deal with people who cross our border illegally, and there should be consequences,’ she said.

Only Useful Fools Believe in Kamala’s Changes

Those familiar with her chameleon-like tactics accuse her of worsening the immigration crisis. The Trump-Vance campaign issued a statement criticizing Harris's last-minute trip and her calls for increased security, blaming her policies for the chaos and violence at the border. Republicans claim Harris' past actions have contributed to the border crisis.

Republicans claim Harris's visit to the border is a sham and accuse her of being one of the main culprits responsible for creating the border chaos that cannot be repaired under a Democratic regime.

Most analysts and critics argue that Harris is trying to address a crisis caused by the Democrats with the same failed policies that led to the immigration crisis they created.

Consequences of Uncontrolled Mass Immigration

Job Losses and Lower Wages for US Workers

The border crisis created by Kamala Harris and Joe Biden as a continuation of Obama's third term in office behind the scenes has led to the exploitation of both US workers and undocumented immigrants. Businesses have taken advantage of undocumented workers by paying them lower wages and denying them basic labor rights and protections.

This has created unfair competition for US workers, who are losing employment opportunities and suffering wage cuts as a result of the increase in cheap labor offered by immigrants.

Serious Threat to the Safety and Public Health of Americans

In addition to economic problems, open borders have seriously endangered the safety and public health of Americans:

Uncontrolled immigration has led to an increase in violent crime, drug trafficking, human trafficking, and the spread of infectious diseases.

Loss of American National Identity and Judeo-Christian Values

The mass immigrant invasions created by Kamala Harris and Biden reflect deeper divisions in US society over the immigration policy they are provoking:

A loss of national identity and a move away from Judeo-Christian mores and moral concepts that have been progressively imposed since the Obama presidency with the implementation of policies of Fabian socialism with neo-Marxist variants of cultural Marxism.

Kamala’s Ties to Foreign Powers That Are Enemies of the United States

It is extremely troubling and suspicious of Kamala Harris' connection to NIAC (National Iranian American Council) and how it could affect her decisions on Iran and national security. NIAC supports the Iranian government and promotes policies that help Iran, not the US, so Harris's ties to NIAC may make it difficult for her to make decisions that are in the best interest of the US at best, as she could be facilitating Iran's spying activities.

“Harris’ hypocritical policy towards Iran, on the one hand, claims to defend the rights of Iranian women, and on the other hand, is contradictory, as she seeks a new nuclear agreement that favors Iran by pretending to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, using the same arguments as Obama in 2015, who gave billions of dollars to the Ayatollahs, reasons why Iran has become militarily stronger and has reached the capacity to become a nuclear power willing to eliminate Israel from the face of the earth.

In contrast to the administration of then-President Donald Trump, who withdrew from the failed Nuclear Deal in 2018.

Israel, the main ally of the United States, has clearly expressed itself against returning to a flawed and bad Harris agreement, which only aims to cowardly appease Iran. While the Ayatollahs are already capable of producing nuclear weapons due to the failed policies of these agreements of the Democratic governments.

Conclusion

Kamala Harris's political positions on Islamic terrorism and illegal immigration have raised alarm bells about the presidential candidate's commitment to America's defense and security. While she presents herself as a defender of equality and justice, her far-left policies with neo-Marxist principles have only endangered Judeo-Christian principles, the right to life of the unborn, the economic and social stability of Americans, the safety of citizens, and the security of the country.

Everyone needs to be aware of the vice president's shady political and principled positions on these issues to ensure that the United States remains a fair democracy and to be able to pull it out of the neo-Marxist abyss into which Kamala, Obama, and the deep state intend to plunge it.

As Kamala Harris continues her chameleon-like work in her bid for the presidency, she will have to confront these accusations and explain her shady positions to the electorate who must choose between a president who is leading us to socialist failure and a president who will lead us to progress and make America great again like Donald J. Trump. MAGA!

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

The DemocRat Campaign Incites Trump Assassination

Leer en Español

Analysis of the Violent Rhetoric Used by DemocRat Leaders and Their Supporters

1. Introduction

Since the 2016 election and up to the present day, the political campaigns of the DemocRat leaders against Trump have been so irresponsible and dirty, with constant accusations and attacks by DemocRat leaders accompanied by famous "progressive" artists and personalities and with the complicity of media propaganda that they have gone to the extreme of turning political campaigns into a vendetta that promotes the assassination of former President Trump as a normal process.
We have already seen two assassination attempts on Trump and will, unfortunately, continue to see them if the perpetrators of these ethically and morally unacceptable policies do not cease their aim to stop their damaging propaganda that also represents a serious threat to the stability and security of the United States.

2. Political Rhetoric and Its Impact on the Anti-Trump Attacks

Political rhetoric plays a fundamental role in shaping public opinion and a healthy political climate in general. The idea that it is legitimate or acceptable to promote a political opponent with slander, lies, and even physical threats goes against every democratic and constitutional principle in the United States. Regardless of the political or ideological differences that may exist between candidates for any political office, respect for the life and safety of a political opponent must be respected and protected, to prevent the assassination attempts that we are discussing today in the case of the second attempt on the life of former President Trump, due to the rhetoric of the very serious false accusations against Trump that have been promoted and are being promoted by Biden, Kamala, and other senior Democratic Party officials and leaders, portraying him as an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs, who must be targeted, and calling him a threat to democracy and existential danger to the United States, which may stimulate and encourage his fervent supporters to commit the assassination of the president as a righteous and patriotic act in defense of the nation.

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

Examples of Statements by Democrat Leaders Who Have Encouraged Trump's Attacks

Here are some of the most irresponsible and pathetic statements by Democratic leaders that could be the breeding ground for attacks on former President Trump.

President Joe Biden: "Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs."

President Biden: "Trump is a threat to democracy." A phrase that may have inspired Routh to commit the second assassination attempt as it is written in his book.

President Joe Biden: "Let's stop talking about the debate, it's time to put Trump on the target", days before the first assassination attempt on his Republican rival. A phrase that may have been an encouragement for Crooks to carry out the attack.

Vice President and current presidential candidate Kamala Harris: "Donald Trump left us with the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War", another phrase that could also inspire his fans like Routh who wrote something very similar; "The catastrophe of January 6, perpetrated by Donald Trump and his anti-democratic group."

Kamala Harris: "Trump is a threat to our democracy and fundamental rights."

Tim Walz (current US vice-presidential candidate): "Are [Republicans] a threat to democracy? Yes... Are they going to endanger people's lives? Yes."

NOTE: In his book on Ukraine Routh wrote: "You are free to assassinate Trump as much as me for that error in judgment (referring to him for electing a president who ended up being brainless and the dismantling of the deal referring to Trump's exit from the Iran nuclear pact)."

Dan Goldman (D-NY-10) in an interview with MSNBC's Jen Psaki said: "Trump's “dangerous rhetoric” represents a risk to democracy and therefore the Republican should be “removed”.

Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House of Representatives): "You have to be prepared to punch Donald Trump."

Senator Jon Tester (D-MT): Donald Trump is "bad for this country" and that Democrats should "punch him in the face."

Joe Biden (2020 campaign): "I'd like to take him behind the gym if I were in high school."
"If we were in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the crap out of him."

Rep. Maxime Waters (D-CA) "I'm going to take Trump out tonight." "If you see someone from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, in a gas station, you go out and you create a crowd, you push them out and you tell them They're not welcome anywhere anymore."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts): "Get it out now. Could President Trump get away with sending in an FBI hit squad to take out anyone he decided was a threat?"

Cynthia A. Johnson (State Representative - Michigan): "Well, this is just a warning to you Trumpers.
Tread carefully. Tread carefully. And for those of you who are soldiers, make them pay."

• Some political leaders have used language describing their opponents as "threats to democracy" or employed aggressive metaphors in their speeches.
• Public figures, including celebrities, have made statements that could be interpreted as encouraging aggressive action.

Responsibility of Leaders

• Political leaders have a special responsibility for the tone of public discourse, as a tone of physical aggression against an opponent can be turned into reality by a passionate supporter.
• Influential figures' words of physical aggression against political leaders can significantly impact how their followers perceive and act in the political arena and can encourage their fanatics to commit the physical aggression expressed in their statements.

3. Media Coverage and Its Role in the Anti-Trump Pandemic

The media play a crucial role in the way political information is presented and perceived. Most of the mainstream media can be included as mediated accomplices to the policies that have provoked the attacks on former President Donald Trump and are most responsible for disseminating the policies of their Democratic allies in a global conspiracy to discredit Trump with countless false publications. Since the former president entered the political arena, they have written millions of articles, essays, editorials, and commentaries discrediting them all with an irresponsible evil cruelty of fake news without the slightest shame and professionalism inherent in their work.

Analysis of Media Coverage

• All major mass media outlets in blatant collusion with the DemocRat party have sensationally promoted and amplified ad nauseam divisive and misleading statements against President Trump, contributing to the distortion and persecution that Trump is America's worst enemy who must be eliminated at all costs and by any means.
• The polarization of this media can be seen in the fact that assassination attempts against Trump have been downplayed and even justified with specious causes in collusion with the Democratic Party.
• The anti-Trump media have downplayed the seriousness of the assassination attempts against the former president, even promoting justifications linking the events to alleged grievances against Trump's policies and rhetoric, demonstrating the media's lack of objectivity and integrity, as well as its bias in favor of the Democratic Party.

In the first assassination attempt against Trump, the anti-Trump press ridiculously tried to downplay the assassination attempt:

• The Washington Post ran the disgraceful headline "Trump escorted outside after loud noises heard at Pennsylvania rally."
• CNN shamefully disinformed with the following headline: "Donald Trump is injured after falling during a rally in Pennsylvania."
• Newsweek blatantly tries to hide the magnitude of the assassination attempt with the headline: "MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement responds with outrage after Donald Trump was injured at a rally" highlighting the outraged reaction of Trump supporters with the malicious aim of downplaying the seriousness of the assassination attempt.
• And endless misleading headlines to minimize the possible causes of the assassination and to protect the bad reputation of the DemocRat politicians who have incited the use of violence and political assassination against the former president.

In the second assassination attempt against Trump, the anti-Trump press ridiculously tried to play down the assassination attempt:

• In the second attack journalists who were deeply in cahoots with Democrat media leaders, such as Lester Holt of NBC News and Norah O'Donnell of CBS News, tried to link Trump to the false bomb threats in Ohio, to justify the assassination attempt by promoting that Thirty-three false bomb threats! But they had no proof! The media was trying to blame the assassination attempt on Trump, and that was part of a collusion that was as bogus as it was blatant. Governor Mike DeWine confirmed that the 33 bomb threats in Springfield, Ohio, were false.

4. Risks of Divisive Escalation Promoted by the Democrat Party

• In these extreme cases, the divisive rhetoric that the DemocrRats have generated in their campaigns to generate visceral and unhealthy hatred against the former president has contributed to an environment where some individuals may even consider actions to assassinate Trump to be justified.
• This poses a risk to democratic stability, the safety of political opponents, and the public safety of the nation that has long been considered an example of the world's most advanced democracy and is now in question.
• The DemocRats need to stop spreading their extremist and divisive escalation of their sick hate messages against Trump as they are irresponsibly encouraging the use of violence that could lead radical elements and/or deranged individuals to the assassination of the former President.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the speeches of the Democrat political leaders, the Biden campaign, and the current Kamala campaign in collusion with the mainstream media against Trump have crossed the red line of insult and moral and political discrediting of the political adversary by irresponsibly promoting a discourse that generates physical aggression and thus the assassination of the former president by inciting violence against him using the most grotesque patriotic epithets against the former president. This irresponsible and dangerous attitude must be condemned by all citizens who value peace, democracy, and respect for the fundamental rights of all people. It is time to put an end to the violent and extremist rhetoric of the Democratic Party and work together for a safer and more prosperous future for all.

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html