Elections
- Details
- Source/Author: THE EPOCH TIMES
Congress to investigate election fraud.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says he isn’t ruling out filing an objection to electoral votes during the joint session of Congress on Jan. 6, 2021.
“We’re still looking at all the legal stuff that’s happening with the legal cases and we’ll make our decision after we’ve seen all the legal challenges,” the senator told CNN on Dec. 10.
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) recently told reporters that he’s leaving the option open as well. Johnson, the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, this week will hold the first congressional hearing on the election, citing “irregularities.”
The joint session features both bodies of Congress meeting to count electoral votes.
- Details
- Source/Author: THE FEDERALIST
YouTube will censor election fraud claims. 4 Conspiracies YouTube Allows To Flourish While Censoring Claims Of Election Fraud
YouTube announced Wednesday that the Google-owned video platform would be removing content critical of the 2020 election results and instead would only promote coverage from corporate media.
“Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect,” YouTube released in a statement. “Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome.”
It’s clear, however, that YouTube’s censorship is a one-way street. The new rules delegitimize claims of fraud in a pandemic contest that featured record-turnout in mail-in voting as nothing more than a bogus conspiracy theory.
YouTube is right that former Vice President Joe Biden is indeed the president-elect, capturing 306 electoral votes to President Donald Trump’s 232. The Trump campaign however has launched a series of legal challenges in several tipping-point states contesting the outcome, pursuing every avenue to prove its claims in court. Whether there was enough fraud to tip the race in Biden’s favor last month remains to be seen. Whether fraud actually took place, there’s no question.
- Details
- Source/Author: PJ MEDIA
Marxist GA Senate candidate: apologist for Castro. Democrat Raphael Warnock Carried Water for Fidel Castro Days After Cuban Dictator's Death.
Two days after former Cuban dictator Fidel Castro died in 2016, Pastor Raphael Warnock — now a candidate for U.S. Senate in the Georgia runoff elections — defended Castro’s legacy as “complex,” comparing it to the legacy of the United States of America. Warnock previously worked as assistant pastor at a church that invited Castro to speak in 1995.
“We pray for the people of Cuba in this moment,” Warnock said. “We remember Fidel Castro, whose legacy is complex. Don’t let anyone tell you a simple story; life usually isn’t very simple. His legacy is complex, kind of like America’s legacy is complex.”
Nathan Brand, a communications expert with the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) shared the video.
Read more: Marxist GA Senate candidate: apologist for Castro
- Details
- Source/Author: THE EPOCH TIMES
1/3 of States urge Supreme Court to act on election fraud. Seventeen states are urging the U.S. Supreme Court to take up Texas’s request to challenge the 2020 election results in four battleground states.
The states, led by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, filed a friend-of-the-court brief on Dec. 9, underscoring that the case filed by Texas is of great public importance and requires the attention of the nation’s top court.
Texas on Dec. 7 filed a motion asking for permission to sue Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin in an attempt to protect the integrity of the 2020 election.
The Lone Star state alleges that the four key battleground states unconstitutionally changed election laws, treated voters unequally, and triggered significant voting irregularities by relaxing ballot integrity measures.
In the brief, the 17 states argue that the Texas lawsuit warrants review by the high court as it presents important constitutional issues under the Electors Clause. It also raises concerns about election integrity and public confidence in the handling of elections, they added.
Read more: 1/3 of States urge Supreme Court to act on election fraud
