The Absurd and the Unnatural Go Hand in Hand With the Progressives
Neo-Discrimination and the Impact of Progressive Ideologies on Contemporary Society
Table of Contents
- Neo-discrimination
- Inclusive Language and Its Implications
- Gender Identity and Sports
- Public Spaces and Gender Identity
- Education and Autonomy
- The Abortion Controversy
- Impact on Minorities and Majorities
- Social and Generational Consequences
- Conclusions
Neo-Discrimination
Contemporary society is going through a radical transformation driven by left-wing ideologues who seek to control the population through the manipulation of language to suppress freedom of expression. These ideologues appropriate and distort terms such as "change", "freedom", "democracy" and "equality" among others, transforming them into slogans that reflect a political agenda of the extreme left disguised as diversity, equity, and inclusivity. This process aligns with the Gramscian strategy of cultural domination, led by neo-Marxist intellectuals and personalities who use left-dominated institutions and governments to implant their theories of indoctrination and "neo-discrimination subtly." This phenomenon arises due to the implementation of progressive leftist ideologies and neo-Marxist policies. Through mechanisms of censorship and social control, they try to silence any vestige of conservative opposition or those who simply hold views contrary to their ideology. This essay aims to examine how these ideological currents impact various aspects of social life, from the language used in public and/or scientific discourse to the policies implemented by governments to destroy the concept of family. In short, the influence of neo-Marxist progressive ideology and its ability to reshape the current social narrative and institutional structures is revealed.
Inclusive Language and Its Implications
The debate on inclusive language represents one of the most visible changes in today's society. While its promoters argue that they promote false equality and inclusion, we can point out that these linguistic modifications:
- They censor an open, plural, and effective communication of reality on political, economic, and social issues
- Altering established linguistic structures by adapting them to their neo-Marxist ideology
- Create new forms of social exclusion or neo-discrimination with their false doctrines of diversity, equity, and inclusion
Gender Identity and Sports
Gender Identity
For neo-Marxist progressives, being politically correct implies adopting an inclusive language that devalues the concept of biological gender, replacing it with self-identified gender. This leads to men identifying as women and vice versa, allowing men to compete in women's sports, participate in beauty pageants, and access public restrooms designated for women. It also encourages children to be able to dress and act according to their gender identity without the approval of their parents, which suggests that the government and its institutions have more authority than the parental figure.
Sports and Transgender Competitions
The participation of transgender people in sports competitions has generated a significant debate about equity in sports. The concern lies in the biological differences inherent in the male physical constitution that endows the male sex with greater corpulence and physical strength and as such these biological characteristics affect the results of fair competition.
Proposed Solutions
It is proposed to create a specific category for transgender athletes, which would allow:
- Maintaining Competitive Fairness
- Respect the rights of all participants
- Preserving the integrity of the sport
Public Spaces and Gender Identity
Current Problems
The implications of gender identity extend beyond sports to public facilities such as bathrooms and changing rooms. Policies that promote access based on gender identity rather than biological sex are detrimental to a person's security, privacy, and natural rights.
The management of public spaces such as bathrooms and changing rooms presents particular challenges concerning gender identity. Current policies raise concerns about:
- Personal Safety
- Individual privacy
- Fundamental rights
Proposed Alternatives
It is suggested to implement additional unisex spaces that:
- Complement existing facilities
- Respect the needs of all users
- Maintain privacy and security
Education and Autonomy
The Role of Educational Institutions
Education is another key area in which progressive ideologies manifest themselves. There are educational institutions that have adopted policies that allow children to explore their gender identity without parental consent, arguing neo-Marxist theories of "protecting" children's autonomy and their right to express themselves, destroying parental rights.
Educational institutions are at the center of the debate on gender identity in minors. Current policies raise questions about:
- Child autonomy that violates the parental right to know the gender changes that their children intend to make in complicity with school institutions
- The role of institutions aims to supplant the paternal authority that parents have over their children
- Parental rights cannot be expropriated by any political and/or governmental identity
Parental Rights vs. Institutional Policies
It is argued that decisions about the gender identity of minors should include:
- Active Parental Involvement
- Consideration of the child's welfare
- Balancing individual and parental rights
The Abortion Controversy
Acceptance of abortion laws has reached significant milestones, with some regions allowing abortion up to the moment of birth, which represents the most extreme time of prenatal crime. Proponents claim that this legislation safeguards women's rights over their reproductive choices. However, the extremes of these laws provoke unease among many who argue that they disregard the value of fetal life by embracing the neo-Marxist ideology of expanding abortion rights as a more ruthless cultural shift from ethical values and social and moral considerations.
Abortion legislation represents one of the most polarized debates in today's society. The extreme positions in this debate reflect:
- Different interpretations of reproductive rights that dehumanize the reproductive process and deny the right to life of unborn children
- Devaluation of the ethical, moral and/or religious considerations of society
Impact on Minorities and Majorities
This ideology, in which a minority seeks to impose its criteria on the majority, results in a new form of discrimination that ignores the biological and social nature of people. In addition, belonging to the LGTBIQi community is presented as a privileged status, while being black becomes a favorable selection criterion in aspects such as education and employment, above intellectual or moral capacity.
Current inclusion policies have generated paradoxical effects:
- Creating new forms of discrimination
- Educational, labor and social privileges are granted to LGTBIQi minorities and black people
- Marginalization of heterosexual and/or white majority groups
Social and Generational Consequences
Current social changes are having a significant impact on political and social life:
- Neo-Marxist proposals distort the formation of children's and young people's gender identity
- The destruction of roles of parental authority in the moral and social education of their children
- Neo-Marxist educational indoctrination, and suppression of society's fundamental moral values
Conclusions
The social transformation driven by progressive neo-Marxist ideologies presents significant challenges to the conservative and religious community in safeguarding its political, social convictions and the morality of the new generations.
For the good of the country and the normal development of children, President-elect Donald Trump promised on Sunday to "stop the transgender madness" on the first day of his presidency.
"I will sign executive orders to end child sexual mutilation, get transgender people out of the military and out of our elementary and middle schools," Trump said at an event for conservative youth in Phoenix, Arizona.
He also promised to "keep men out of women's sports." "It will be the official policy of the U.S. government that there are only two genders, male and female," Trump added.
José Tarano is a technical producer, graphic designer, collaborator, and researcher at Patria de Martí ► and The CubanAmerican Voice ►. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering in Telecommunications from José Antonio Echeverria Superior Polytechnic Institute (ISPJAE). In addition, he is the founder and director of Electronics JR Computer Design and Service ►, a computer and information technology services company. Originally from Santiago de las Vegas, Havana, Cuba, he currently resides in the United States.