Elections

Harris accuses Trump of causing women's deaths due to his pro-life policies

Leer en Español

Harris knows she will lose the election if Trump stays alive

Kamala and the corrupt media continue to irresponsibly promote the assassination of the former president to win the presidency because they know that her inflammatory statements could provoke a family member of one of the victims and/or a partisan zealot to try to take justice into their own hands inspired by the false accusations she continues to make for that sick purpose in collusion with the DemocRAT media:

Kamala Harris at a rally in Atlanta used with all her lying viciousness the case of Amber Thurman, 28, who suffered complications after taking an abortion pill and died in August 2022 in Georgia because she was not treated in time and BLAMED TRUMP FOR HER DEATH, PRACTICALLY PROMOTING THE LYNCHING OF THE EXPRESIDENT:

Harris called for the crowd to chant Thurman's name.

Harris demonstrates her political baseness, her lack of honesty, and her lack of personal values by claiming that women are dying as a result of Donald Trump's pro-life laws.

As we Cubans would say: This lady has a very long viper tongue! and she continues to promote Trump's assassination.

Kamala is undoubtedly a liar who will say anything to deceive the people and continue to promote her radical feminist and extremist abortionist policy without time limits that supports abortion up to the moment of birth and late-term abortion. She promotes taxpayer-funded abortions, falsely claiming they will save the lives of low-income women, but without considering the crime being committed on unborn children.

Research Shows Kamala's Lies

 

Direct link: https://cubanamericanvoice.com/pwa.html

 

Research has shown that misleading claims and misinformation can potentially influence public perception and policy decisions. In recent times, there have been statements by Kamala Harris and Democratic leaders that have provoked controversy and debate around the issue of abortion and women's health. Harris blatantly and without credible substantiation claimed that women are dying as a result of pro-life laws implemented by Donald Trump. This claim has been refuted by organizations such as the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). This essay will delve into the historical context, key figures, and the impact of these statements on the discourse surrounding abortion laws in the United States.

The abortion debate has been a contentious issue in American society for decades. The landmark Roe v. Wade Supreme Court case in 1973 legalized abortion nationwide, but since then there have been ongoing efforts to restrict access to abortion through state legislation. Donald Trump's presidency was a boost to pro-life policies and the Supreme Court ruled to overturn the ruling known as ‘Roe v. Wade’, which had guaranteed abortion rights in the country since 1973, leaving the decision on abortion in the hands of the states.

Kamala Harris, the US vice-president and presidential candidate, has been a strong advocate for women's so-called reproductive rights and access to health care, which due to her extremist policy of approving abortion without limits has led to millions of terminations of the lives (crimes) of unborn children.

Harris blamed Thurman's death on Donald Trump on Tuesday, saying: ‘Women are bleeding to death in car parks, turned away from emergency rooms, losing their ability ever to have children again. Survivors of rape and incest are being told they can't make decisions about what happens next to their bodies. And now women are dying. These are the consequences of Donald Trump's actions."

‘One in three women in America lives in a state where abortion is banned because of Trump,’ Harris told a rally in Atlanta.

‘This is a health crisis and Donald Trump is the architect of that crisis,’ Harris ratified in Georgia.

Kamala's false statement baselessly claiming that women are dying because of pro-life laws under the Trump administration has raised eyebrows and prompted fact-checking by organizations such as KFF. The Kaiser Family Foundation, known for its expertise in health policy analysis, refuted Harris' claim by pointing out that all current state abortion bans contain exceptions to prevent death or preserve the life of the pregnant person. This factual correction is crucial to dispel misinformation and ensure that public discourse is based on reality.

Influential people like Kamala Harris play a crucial role in shaping public opinion and policy decisions. As a high-profile politician and women's rights advocate, Harris' statements carry weight and can influence public perception. However, public figures must rely on accurate information and data when making statements, especially on sensitive issues such as abortion. In this case, the intervention of organizations such as the Kaiser Family Foundation highlights the importance of fact-checking and holding public officials accountable for the information they disseminate.

Kamala’s Pro-Abortion Rallying Cry To Mobilize Support for Her Campaign

On the one hand, Harris's claim that women are dying as a result of pro-life laws can be seen as a rallying cry to mobilize support for her pro-abortion campaign that she promotes as ‘reproductive rights’. By framing the issue in terms of life and death, Harris may be trying to galvanize public opinion and confront pro-life policies. On the other hand, however, Kamala's dissemination of false information is undermining the credibility of the pro-abortion movement and undermining the extremist arguments for eliminating birthright masquerading as women's reproductive rights.

As we advance, it is essential that policymakers and so-called ‘women's rights advocates’ focus on evidence-based arguments and accurate information when debating laws on abortion and women's health. Misleading claims only serve to polarize the debate and derail the search for common ground on this complex issue. By promoting informed dialogue and fact-based policymaking, we can work to ensure that women have access to safe, legal care without the extremism of promoting abortion as the only solution over the right to life of the unborn, while preserving the health and well-being of the mother-to-be and the future of the human being inside her body, interrupting the divine process only if the mother's life is in danger.

Abortion as a Central Issue in the US Elections 2024: Controversial Statements and State Referendums

The abortion debate has become a central issue in the 2024 US presidential race, with Vice President Kamala Harris promoting attacks on former President Donald Trump's pro-life campaigns and several states scheduling crucial referendums on the issue.

Harris’s Comments and the Controversy

At a rally in Atlanta, Georgia, Vice President Kamala Harris accused Donald Trump of being the ‘architect’ of the rollback of so-called ‘abortion rights’ in the United States.

Harris asserted Trump's false culpability: ‘One in three women in America lives in a state where abortion is banned because of Trump,’ referring to Trump's appointments of conservative judges who contributed to the reversal of Roe v. Wade in 2022.

Harris specifically mentioned the case of Amber Thurman, a 28-year-old woman who died in Georgia in 2022 after complications from a medical abortion, stating, ‘This is a health crisis and Donald Trump is the architect of that crisis.’

Landmark Cases and Responses

Harris' false statements have been challenged by several experts and organizations, focusing on two tragic cases in Georgia:

1. Amber Thurman: Obtained abortion drugs in North Carolina in 2022 and died in Georgia during emergency surgery due to complications.
2. Candi Miller: Ordered abortion pills online in 2022 and died after not seeking medical care for fear of legal consequences.

Organizations such as the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America have argued that these cases are not a direct result of Georgia's abortion laws but of misinformation and medical complications.

Abortion in the 2024 Elections

The abortion debate will play a crucial role in the 2024 elections, not only in the presidential race but also at the state level:

1. State referendums: Ten states will hold referendums on abortion on the same day as the presidential election (5 November 2024):
   • Florida, Arizona, Colorado, Maryland, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York and South Dakota.
2. Variety of proposals: Proposals range from protecting abortion rights to severely restricting them:
   • In Colorado, it is proposed to keep abortion legal during nine months of pregnancy.
   • In Florida, it seeks to allow abortion beyond six weeks if a doctor deems it necessary.
   • Nebraska will vote on two opposing measures: one to protect the current pro-life law and one to establish a constitutional right to abortion.
3. Impact of the repeal of Roe v. Wade: These referenda are a direct consequence of the Supreme Court's decision in 2022 that returned the power to legislate on abortion to the states.
4. Citizen participation: In most states, these initiatives grew out of citizen petitions that gathered thousands of signatures.

Consequences and National Debate

This situation has generated intense national debate:

1. Polarization: The issue of abortion and Harris's extremist proposals remain a highly divisive anti-life issue, with positions strongly opposed to Trump's pro-life policies.
2. Electoral impact: The abortion issue is expected to significantly influence the vote, especially among women.
3. Legal challenges: Many of these initiatives face legal challenges before reaching the ballot box.
4. Information and misinformation: There is growing concern about the spread of misleading misinformation promoted and disseminated by Democratic leaders in blatant collusion with the media that can affect both voters' decisions and women's health and the lives of the unborn.

Conclusion

The abortion debate in the United States has come to a head with the upcoming 2024 elections. Misleading and controversial statements by political figures such as Kamala Harris, along with scheduled referendums in several states, underscore the complexity, importance, and future of this issue in American politics. Kamala's acolytes oppose abortion restrictions enacted by many states and birth rights, using the mask of an alleged threat to women's health to justify extremist abortion without time limits.

What is clear is the need for fact-based dialogue, the importance of ensuring that women have access to accurate information and adequate medical care during pregnancy, childbirth, the postnatal period, and abortion as an exception to the natural rule, and the urgency of addressing misinformation that can have serious consequences. The outcome of these referenda and the 2024 presidential election could have a lasting impact on abortion policy in the United States for years to come.

The reproductive freedom that Harris defends and promotes without limits is that of ending the lives of millions of innocent unborn children without any other option or alternative than the discretionary decision of the mother to end the life of the child.