Details

Published: 13 April 2022

Castroism’s Immigration Weapon

Following the mass demonstrations in Havana in August 1994, known as the “Maleconazo”, the Castro regime tacitly allowed Cubans to leave the country. Here’s why.

Cuban Communism has been methodical and repetitive in its survivorship strategies. It has been systematic to the point that it is predictable. The use of state terrorism was initiated immediately upon seizing power in 1959. However, this proved early on to not be enough. The Castro regime has also relied on a geographically and politically directed immigration policy to achieve social control. As record numbers of Cubans are reaching the U.S. southern border, Havana’s escape valve approach is obvious. Immigration is another of Castroism’s political durability weapons.

The 11th of July Cuban Popular Insurrection of 2021 (11J) blew Castro-Communism’s mind. Hannah Arendt keenly noted that the most seminal component of a totalitarian regime was its ability to cohesively organize society and political power. The magnitude of the 11J mass demonstrations convinced the Marxist dictatorship that their organizational skills were gravely deficient.

Read more: Castroism’s Immigration Weapon

Details

Published: 09 April 2022

Ukraine and the Revival of the West

The globalist world order that made China the world’s factory and Russia the European Union’s oil and gas provider is ethically anti-Western.

As Russia’s war against Ukraine, with its ensuing genocide and flagrant war crimes’ surpasses its first month, the West appears to be recovering from an identity crisis. Many Putin defenders in the Free World label the Ukrainian state as a “globalist” tool and look to the Russian despot as a force against “globalism.” There is a grave contradiction in that reasoning. Ukraine and the principle of national sovereignty and democratic values may well turn out to be a needed revival for the West.

For semantic precision, the West is not about geography. It is a standard-bearer for a set of values that foster notions of consensual government, free societies, the rule of law, and natural rights. The antitheses to this social-political prototype, versions of totalitarian or authoritarian autocratic rule, have benefited enormously from the post-World War II order of a global commonwealth. This internationalist paradigm has been underlined by the premise that economic relations are primacy instigators of political conduct. China, Vietnam, the former USSR, Putin’s Russia, and political actors like George Soros, have been prime beneficiaries of this model. This globalist paragon is anti-Western. This is the “globalism” that Putin apologists fail to see.

Read more: Ukraine and the Revival of the West

Details

Published: 06 April 2022

The Ukrainian Killing Fields and the Radbruch Formula

The hideous massacres that Russia is committing and to which the world is a witness to, should suffice to energetically move the West and place potent offensive weapons in the hands of the Ukrainian armed forces.

Retreating Russian troops are leaving behind a trail of heinous atrocities. This was expected. Life, for the Putin regime and the country it controls, matters little. The Soviet Union and post-USSR Russia have a compelling history of waging war like savage barbarians. The liberated territories of Ukraine are showing the world that Russians have continued the uncivilized pattern of warfare that has characterized them for the last 105 years. The uncovered Ukrainian killing fields in Bucha, Irpin, Motyzhyn, Staryi Bykiv, Zabuchchya, Vorzel, Malaya Rohan, Trostyanets, and Mariupol raise a renewed international challenge to draw upon the Radbruch Formula against Russia in the International Criminal Court.

Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba called the horrific sightings, the “tip of the iceberg.” Testimonial accounts, lamentably, abound. Four hundred twenty-one civilian casualties were uncovered on Sunday alone. Anatoly Fedoruk, the mayor of Bucha, a city on the outskirts of Kyiv that was under Russian occupation, noted that over two hundred eighty corpses were unearthed from mass graves. Photographs of dead civilians with their hands tied behind the back and gunshots to the head at close range offer clear signs of sadistic, execution-type killings. The naked dead bodies of women relay sessions of mass rape. Satellite images leave no room for doubt that the beastly crimes were committed by the Russian army. 

Upon visiting Bucha on Monday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was visibly touched by the horror he was witnessing. Emphatically, he condemned this as an act of “genocide” and the execution of “war crimes.” The Churchillian leader was not alone in this position. The U.S. view, as expressed by National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, coincides with the Ukrainian authorities that highlight that this “show(s) further evidence of war crimes” against civilians. International outrage is leaving little room for timid reactions.

In a makeshift grave in a wooden area just outside Motyzhyn, a town 28 miles (ca. 45 kilometers) west of Kyiv, the tortured bodies of Olha Sukhenko, her husband Ihor Sukhenko and their 25-year-old son, Oleksandr, were discovered by authorities. “They tortured and murdered the whole family of the village head,” said Anton Herashchenko, former deputy minister at the Ukrainian Ministry of Internal Affairs. In addition to civilians and elected officials, Ukrainian prisoners of war (POW) offer further evidence of war crimes. On April 4, Ukrainian human rights ombudsman Lyudmyla Denisova confirmed that swapped prisoners of a recent exchange exhibited “signs of frostbitten limbs.” The Ukrainian POW’s, related Denisova, were imprisoned in basements without heating, denied food and kept without adequate clothing. Russia is unrelentingly violating the Geneva Conventions of 1949. 

The Main Directorate of Intelligence of the Ukrainian Defense has made public a list with the names of Russian soldiers that operated in the Bucha locality during its occupation. The war crimes and the crimes against humanity committed rests on those soldiers, not only the Putin regime. Individual perpetrators bear responsibility The pathetic excuse of “just following orders” will not cut it. That matter was settled in 1946, thanks to the work of a German jurist, Gustav Radbruch, whose essay “Statutory Lawlessness and Suprastatutory Law,” outlined a course which judges in the Nuremberg Trials followed.

It was referred to as the “Radbruch Formula.” As the Nazi regime collapsed, the liberating forces unveiled the horrors of National Socialism. It turned out that a whole legal structure validated the atrocities. True to military discipline, German commanders insisted that they were only “following orders.” The Radbruch Formula established that if an act was so barbaric in nature, any law that authorized its execution was invalidated. Criminal accountability could not be pinned only on one person, in this case, Adolf Hitler. Individual culpability could not be circumvented.    

U.S. President Abraham Lincoln issued, in 1863, the world’s first modern codification of military conduct during a war. The “General Orders No. 100,” (Lieber Code), with its 157 provisions, established the legal basis for civilized behavior in the conduction of war. Respect for civilian lives, gentlemanly composure by combatants, and a standardized treatment of POWs are some of the norms that Lincoln’s war conduct codification sought to institute.

The invading Russian forces are proving that they are but a band of ghastly hordes. Putin’s fabricated historical fable prescribes nothing less than genocide to wipe out Ukraine and Ukrainians. The hideous massacres that Russia is committing and to which the world is a witness to, should suffice to energetically move the West and place potent offensive weapons in the hands of the Ukrainian armed forces. The Free World can never say, they did not know or did not see.

©The Cuban American Voice. All rights reserved. Reproduction is prohibited without express permission.

Details

Published: 05 April 2022

Ukrainian Deputy Inna Sovsun On Why Russia Started The War.

Inna Sovsun commended the Ukrainian resistance against the Russian invasion.

Member of the Ukrainian Parliament Inna Sovsun gave an exclusive interview with El American to talk with our contributor Julio M. Shiling about the heroic resistance of the Ukrainian Army in the face of Russia’s invasion.

Inna Sovsun, who was a former minister of education and science in her country and served as vice president of the Kyiv School of Economics, says she is amazed at the strength Ukrainian soldiers have shown in the field of warfare to defend their country.

“I remember my feelings and thoughts on the first day of the war, when we heard the explosions and several hours after that, like literally five hours after we heard the explosions, we heard that the Russians were in Hostomel, which is 70 kilometers north of Kyiv,” Sovsun recalled, having believed that the Russians would take Kyiv within hours.

Sovsun, proud of the Ukrainian resistance

“Magnificent things” began to happen, the Ukrainian politician says, when ordinary citizens took up arms and voluntarily set off for Hostomel to fight the invaders. “We will kill them, we will not surrender, we will fight as long as we can,” they exclaimed.

Another “truly amazing” thing Sovsun has witnessed in Ukraine is that, in cities that were occupied by Russian forces, Ukrainian citizens have come out to protest their presence, to peacefully insist that they leave.

“I knew that Ukrainians are strong, I knew that they are resilient, I knew that they are stubborn, but you must realize that we are fighting a huge country, a huge army as well, even I had my doubts,” the deputy expressed. “Well, not anymore. Now, I am proud to say that I am Ukrainian and we can fight, definitely.”

Sovsun stresses that, although the conflict between Russia and Ukraine may seem recent, it is in fact “an ongoing battle between a European civilization and a barbarian civilization”, and says she hopes that this war will help his country to take “the final step towards Europe.”

“And that’s what Russia fears,” Sovsun continued. “That’s why they started the war. For this specific reason: because they are afraid that Ukraine will move westward, not militarily, but civilizational, and putting forward those ideas that they are so afraid of.”

©The Cuban American Voice and "El American". All rights reserved. Reproduction is prohibited without express permission.