Ending the Cuban Communist Dictatorship
In a decisive move that aligns with America's renewed focus on national interests, the Trump administration is reportedly pursuing regime change in Cuba, aiming to dismantle the 67-year-old communist dictatorship by the end of 2026. This policy, rooted in recent developments and strategic imperatives, represents a long-overdue correction to decades of foreign dependency and oppression on the island. By leveraging economic vulnerabilities, insider collaborations, and military presence, the U.S. is poised to restore true sovereignty to Cuba, freeing it from parasitic ties that have sustained a tyrannical regime.
The Issue of Sovereignty
At its core, Castro-Communism has never embodied genuine Cuban sovereignty. It was born and bred as a puppet of international forces. From the outset, Fidel and Raúl Castro's quest for power against Fulgencio Batista's regime was entangled with Soviet influence. Soviet espionage within the U.S. State Department was successful in disinformation promotion, enabling Moscow to bolster the rebels and obscure the fact that the Castro brothers had connections with the USSR. The American arms embargo in 1958 played a pivotal role in the January 1, 1959, takeover—more so than any rebel military triumphs. The Cuban Communist Party, established in the 1920s, was a direct offspring of global communism, fully conceived and funded by foreign ideologues.
Post-1959, the regime's survival hinged on chronic external aid. Soviet subsidies propped up the economy until the Berlin Wall's fall in 1989, after which foreign loans and Western investments in state-capitalist joint ventures filled the void. This parasitic dependence persisted. Venezuelan oil under Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro became a lifeline, supplemented by the leasing of neo-slave labor abroad for hard currency. Illicit drug money, another source of regime survival income, is funneled through geopolitical networks. Such reliance underscores that Cuban communism was never self-sustaining or sovereign. It thrived as a leech on foreign entities, subjugating its people to maintain power. Ending this dictatorship isn't an infringement on sovereignty. It is a liberation from foreign-imposed chains, allowing Cubans to reclaim their nation's destiny free from Moscow's ghosts, Caracas's oil, or Beijing's creeping influence.
The Regime's Fragility and U.S. Strategy
Recent reporting from The Wall Street Journal highlights the Trump administration's opportunistic push for regime change, viewing the Cuban regime's grip as exceptionally weak. With no concrete plan yet formalized, U.S. officials are scouting insiders within Havana's apparatus to orchestrate a political transition, ousting leaders like 94-year-old Raúl Castro and dictator Miguel Díaz-Canel. The economy teeters on collapse, plagued by shortages of essentials, medicine, and power outages. The January 3, 2026, U.S.-led capture of Maduro in Venezuela severed Cuba's vital oil subsidy, leaving the island weeks from fuel depletion. The administration intends to block remaining shipments, accelerating the regime's downfall.
This blueprint draws from the successful Venezuelan operation, where an insider asset facilitated Maduro's concessions and removal. U.S. teams have engaged Cuban exiles and civic groups in Miami and Washington to identify potential collaborators. A dual strategy emerges: ramp up pressure while offering an "off-ramp" for negotiated exits. President Trump's January 11 Truth Social post encapsulated this: "NO MORE OIL OR MONEY GOING TO CUBA – ZERO!" urging a deal before it's too late. The White House's silence on inquiries underscores a calculated, results-oriented approach. Far from reckless, this affirms U.S. commitment to hemispheric stability, capitalizing on Cuba's self-inflicted vulnerabilities to foster a democratic transition.
Military Presence as a Deterrent
Complementing economic levers, U.S. military assets signal resolve. The nuclear-powered USS George H.W. Bush aircraft carrier—capable of deploying over 90 aircraft and 5,000 personnel—positioned itself 60 nautical miles north of Varadero, conducting live-fire exercises. This follows the relocation of amphibious ships like the USS Iwo Jima and USS San Antonio to nearby waters post-Maduro's ouster. Cuban authorities' silence speaks volumes, while Díaz-Canel's defiant speech decrying Trump's warnings as "incitation to massacre" reveals desperation, not strength. Trump has publicly described Cuba as "sinking" without Venezuelan aid, hinting at intervention if needed: "enter and destroy the place." This posturing isn't aggression but a prudent show of force, deterring regime intransigence and protecting U.S. interests. It echoes historical resolve, ensuring no repeat of past appeasements that allowed communism to fester miles from Florida's shores.
The “Donroe” Doctrine: Strategic Foundation
Underpinning these actions is the U.S. Department of State's Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2026-2030, released by Secretary Marco Rubio. This America First framework revives the Monroe Doctrine as the "Donroe Doctrine," declaring the Western Hemisphere off-limits to extra-hemispheric threats like China or Russia. Goal 2 prioritizes countering foreign influence—military bases, debt traps, and critical asset control—while strengthening alliances through fair trade, near-shoring, and anti-narcotics efforts.
For Cuba, this means eradicating a lingering Soviet-era outpost, aligning with objectives to suppress narco-terrorism and promote market-oriented prosperity. By reallocating 40% of foreign aid to the hemisphere, the U.S. invests in alternatives to communist models, fostering regional primacy essential for domestic renewal. This doctrine formalizes Trump's vision: a strong, adversary-free backyard bolstering global U.S. leverage.
In conclusion, the U.S. pursuit of ending Cuban communism is a principled stand for sovereignty, exploiting a fragile regime through strategic pressure, military deterrence, and doctrinal clarity. This isn't imperialism—it's the antidote to decades of foreign parasitism, promising a freer, more prosperous Cuba integrated into a secure Western Hemisphere. As Trump asserts, the time for deals is now; the alternative is inevitable collapse. This policy deserves full support, heralding a new era of American leadership and Cuba’s freedom.
© The CubanAmerican Voice. All rights reserved.
Julio M. Shiling is a political scientist, writer, columnist, lecturer, media commentator, and director of Patria de Martí and The CubanAmerican Voice. He holds a master’s degree in Political Science from Florida International University (FIU) in Miami, Florida. He is a member of The American Political Science Association, The PEN Club (Cuban Writers in Exile Chapter) and the Academy of Cuban History in Exile.
Follow Julio on:
📚Published books 📺In the media 👨🏫 Conferences and Symposiums 🎙️Podcast The Shiling Summary