Legal Double Standards: Trump Cases and Impunity for Hillary and Biden
Leer en Español
The Double Standard of the FBI and the DOJ
This article delves into the legal scrutiny that former President Donald Trump faces, contrasting it with the handling of controversies involving previous presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and current President Joe Biden. By examining the legal background of these individuals, ongoing investigations, disparities in media coverage, public perceptions, and broader implications for politics and justice, we aim to shed light on inconsistencies in the application of legal standards and the double standard of justice implemented by the Biden-Obama regime.
It is assumed that in the United States the FBI is in charge, together with the CIA, of safeguarding National Security with absolute adherence to federal laws and the Constitution, not to serve party campaigns or the political interests of internal or external groups and organizations. external and that the DOJ is responsible for enforcing the law and defending the interests of the United States according to the law; ensuring public security against foreign and domestic threats; provide federal leadership in crime prevention and control; demand fair punishment for those guilty of illegal behavior; and ensure fair and impartial administration for all Americans . The separation of powers according to the United States Constitution must prevent the concentration of power in a single person or group: the legislative, executive and judicial branches , however the Biden-Obama regime has violated these precepts by turning the FBI into its political police and the DOJ in a biased instrument of justice against Trump and any person with conservative ideas and/or followers of the former president.
The Legal Background of the Trump, Clinton, and Biden Cases
Donald Trump Legal History
Trump has faced investigations trumped up by his political enemies throughout his career, from the false allegations of the Russian plot to his alleged involvement in the events on Capitol Hill to fraud claims, falsification of business records in New York, sexual assault allegations, falsification of business records in connection with a hush payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, and a string of 37 felonies, including 31 counts of unlawful withholding of government documents of secret national defense information and one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice and challenges to his tax returns promoted by the Biden-Obama regime with the complicity of the FBI and the Justice Department, endorsed by globalism and the neo-Marxist media, who seek at all costs to prevent Trump's victory in the presidential race, co-opt the conservative movement and destroy the conservative culture of his supporters.
Legal Background of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden
Both Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden have also faced mock legal scrutiny in the past and differential treatment by both the FBI and the DOJ who have used "kid gloves" to cover up crimes and interfere in judicial decisions that could prosecute both figures. Clinton was the subject of investigations into her use of a private email server while Secretary of State that clearly endangered the security of the United States, while Biden's corruption crimes and mishandling of government documents have been downplayed and protected as well as crimes related to the Biden family, his son Hunter Biden, evidence of fraud and his businesses abroad, favoring right-wing neo-Marxist ideology.
Investigations and Legal Proceedings Against Trump
Investigations in Progress
Trump is currently facing fabricated investigations by his political enemies in power into possible financial and tax violations, as well as accusations of obstruction of justice ranging from falsifying business records in New York to attempting to subvert the 2020 presidential election between others such as falsification of business records in connection with the payment of an adult film star in 2016, and a string of 37 felonies, including 31 counts of unlawful retention of national defense information and one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice.
Past Legal Political Proceedings
Trump was impeached twice in impeachment trials in the US House of Representatives, but both impeachment attempts were unsuccessful in the Senate.
Past Investigations
The Russian Plot Against Trump
The investigation of the Trump campaign for alleged collusion with Russia was the brainchild of former President Barack Obama to favor Hillary Clinton on the path to the presidency and eliminate the chances of victory for the opponent Trump who involved the FBI and the CIA to spy on the Trump's campaign before the 2016 election that continued during Trump's presidency under DOJ special counsel Robert Mueller and ended in March 2019 with the conclusion that neither he nor anyone around him worked with the Kremlin to win the 2016 elections.
Comparison of Media Coverage of Scandals
The media coverage of the scandals and alleged crimes attributed to Trump and surrounding Clinton and Biden have been covered with the enormous bias and favorable focus that the large globalist media monopolies give to the cases of Clinton and Biden, while they stigmatize those of former President Trump who has been the subject of unprecedented political persecution by the government in power of the United States comparable to those carried out by the socialist dictatorships of Nicaragua and Venezuela.
Public Opinions and Perceptions of Double Standards
Many people have expressed concern about the double standard in the way Trump's legal cases and scandals are handled compared to those of Clinton and Biden, which has sparked debates about fairness and political polarization in the judicial system and media across the country in favor of the democratic regime in power that is heading towards an authoritarian regime with a neo-Marxist tendency.
Political and Legal Implications of the Cases
When it comes to the legal problems of politicians like Trump, Clinton, and Biden, it's like a never-ending soap opera that keeps us glued to our seats. The political and legal implications of these cases are as juicy as a scandal on a reality television show. From conflicts of interest of justice and those in charge of applying it to accusations of violations and bribery of officials and judges. These cases have had a significant impact on the public's perception of political leaders and the loss of trust in the American legal and democratic system.
Analysis of Impartiality in the Judicial System
Let's talk about the elephant in the room: Is the judicial system really blind, or does it occasionally peek through its blindfold? When comparing the treatment of Trump, Clinton, and Biden in the judicial sphere, it is difficult not to wonder if there is a double standard at play. Are we all equal before the law, or do last names like Clinton, Biden, Obama, and Democratic political affiliation come with a get-out-of-jail-free card?
The Role of Social Networks in the Dissemination of Information
In today's digital age, social media is the town crier that spreads information faster than you can say "tweet." The scandals that maliciously blame Trump, and exonerate Clinton and Biden, have been dissected, analyzed, and turned into memes across various platforms. But with great power comes great responsibility, and the role of social media in shaping public opinion and influencing judicial processes is a double-edged sword that favors the interests of globalism, neo-Marxism, and tendencies towards socialism of the democratic party. It's like a digital "Wild West", and sometimes the truth can get lost in a sea of likes and shares.
Reflections on Equity in Justice in the United States
The fabricated courtroom dramas against Trump, and the cover-up of crimes committed by Clinton and Biden, remind us that being a public figure is not always easy when you face the machinery of political power mediated by the interests of globalism. The question of fairness and justice for these high-profile people lingers in the air like a bad smell. Should we demand more from our leaders or is this a case of "celebrity justice" in which fame and political power can tip the balance? It's a tough nut to crack, but one thing is for sure: the courtroom is where the rich, famous, and powerful come to play a high-stakes game of legal chess. In conclusion, comparing judicial procedures and public responses to the Trump, Clinton, and Biden cases raises important questions about fairness and consistency in the American judicial system. As debates continue around the perceived double standard in the approach to scandals, it becomes increasingly crucial to reflect on the principles of equality and fairness that underpin the American legal process. By critically examining these dynamics, we can strive for a more transparent and equitable approach to holding public figures accountable for their actions.
The Million Dollar Question
How Are the Trump, Clinton, and Biden Court Cases Different?
Trump's court cases are marked by the use of justice as a weapon of political persecution by the Biden-Obama regime to avoid at all costs the probable election of Trump as president, while the case of Hilary Clinton was supported by the decision of the former director of the FBI, James B. Comey not to prosecute even though according to his investigation Hillary along with her colleagues “were extremely careless in their handling of highly confidential and sensitive information.” About Biden's corruption crimes and mishandling of government documents have been minimized and protected, as well as crimes related to the Biden family, her son Hunter Biden, evidence of fraud, and his businesses abroad. History shows that all investigations and court cases launched against Trump have had the objective of preventing Trump from being elected president from the Obama Presidency to the Biden Presidency.
Let's hope that Trump is acquitted and elected president so that democracy, Judeo-Christian values can be recovered, and trust in legal institutions and law enforcement agencies can be restored and the United States can recover and return to MAGA.
