Kamala Doesn’t Know How To Govern and Copies Trump’s Policies
Index
- Introduction
- Immigration policies 2.1 Border security 2.2 Border wall 2.3 Measures against illegal immigration
- Environmental policies 3.1. Fracking (hydraulic fracturing)
- Economic policies 4.1. Tip taxes
- Police reform
- Conclusion
1. Introduction
Kamala's inability to govern America is remarkable. She has neither the ideas nor the brains to govern. She resorts to plagiarising Trump's policies on immigration, the environment and tax advice to garner support from the more centrist wing by masking her left-wing extremism and toning down her image as a socialist.
In particular, in areas that were characteristic of Donald Trump's administration, this article examines Harris's policies, which he has copied almost word for word from Trump's policies in three main areas: immigration, the environment, and the economy.
The article also examines Harris's policies, which he has copied almost word for word from Trump's policies in three main areas: immigration, the environment, and the economy.
2. Immigration Policies
2.1. Border Security
Kamala Harris, who fiercely criticized all of Trump's border security policies, has been left with no choice but to adopt the former president's policies by copying them verbatim because of her inability to generate ideas to sustain an impossible government to which she was nominated and hand-picked by the Democratic Party elites and the globalist powers. The Biden-Harris administration has emphasized the need to strengthen security on the southern border, an approach blatantly copied from Trump's policies.
2.2. Border Wall
Harris in April 2017, just after becoming a US senator, claimed that funding for the wall was a ‘stupid use of money’. ‘I will block any funding for it,’ she said then.
Biden and Kamala stopped Biden and Kamala from funding the wall.
Biden and Kamala halted construction of Trump's border wall, but have recently authorized construction of new sections in Texas, citing ‘an acute and immediate need’. This decision marks a significant shift from Harris's previous position that she has changed her stance and is committed to building a wall on the southern US border to stop illegal immigration. Previously, she had harshly criticized the idea of funding Trump's border wall, calling it stupid. However, he has now become responsible for the border and advocates building the wall after presiding over the worst illegal immigration crisis in US history.
2.3. Measures Against Illegal Immigration
Harris has copied Trump on tougher measures to deter illegal immigration, including expedited deportations and faster processing of asylum claims, while previously being a promoter of open borders that led to the largest influx of illegals in US history. She was in favor of getting rid of ICE and even said that crossing the border illegally was not a crime. ‘We're not going to treat undocumented people who cross the border as criminals,’ he said.
3. Environmental Policies
3.1. Fracking (Hydraulic Fracturing)
During the 2020 presidential campaign, Harris was very critical of Trump's support and push for fracking, saying she would ban it on the first day of her presidency. However, she made it very clear during an exclusive interview with CNN that she now supports fracking, the oil and gas extraction process that is largely opposed by climate and environmental activists. His change is because he wants to woo voters in Pennsylvania, which provides 19 electoral votes.
His change is because he wants to woo voters in Pennsylvania, which provides 19 electoral votes.
Vice President Kamala Harris said she would not stop fracking if elected president, reversing her previous opposition to the technique used to produce most of America's oil and gas today.
‘As vice president, I did not ban fracking, Harris said Thursday in an interview on CNN, her strongest statement on the issue since becoming the Democratic nominee.
’As president, I will not ban fracking.‘
"As vice president, I cast the tie-breaking vote that increased permits for fracking. So I'm very clear on where I stand,’ she said, arguing that the US can have a clean energy economy and still embrace fracking.
Trump has historically supported the fracking expansion and prioritized boosting domestic oil and gas production. His administration reduced regulations on the industry, emphasizing energy independence and US economic growth. In contrast the Kamaleon Harris opposed in 2020 when she was a candidate for president for the Democratic Party.
4. Economic Policies
4.1. Tip taxes
Recently, Kamala has proposed eliminating tip taxes, copied verbatim from a measure that Trump had considered during his presidency and is now using in his campaign policies. This policy is intended to benefit service sector workers.
5. Police Reform
Police reform: Although with different approaches, Harris has copied Trump on the policy to increase police funding rather than ‘defund the police’ as he previously proclaimed in 2020. On the ‘Ebro in the Morning’ program on 9 June 2020, Harris claimed that the ‘defund the police’ movement ‘correctly’ questioned the amount of money spent on the police rather than on essential community services. Harris argued that more police do not necessarily translate into greater public safety and criticized the militarization of police departments in American cities.
Harris argued that more police do not necessarily translate into greater public safety and criticized the militarization of police departments in American cities.
6. Conclusion
Kamala Harris's policy changes are carbon copies of Donald Trump's and reflect an inability to govern and a need to adapt to political and economic realities. While the motivations and methods may differ, these botched copies of the candidate underline the insecurity and lack of principle of Kamala's ideology that the big money interests of the DemocRats and the globalist media seek to cover up.
It is important to note that despite these changes that they want to show to the voters to get out the vote, they are merely cosmetic changes of partisan propaganda, which do not imply a substantial change in the neo-Marxist ideology that they intend to implement in the United States.
Don't be fooled by the Hyena-Smiling Chameleon!
