Pandemia & Biological Warfare

Federal Court rules "stay at home" and "mandatory closures" unconstitutional

Federal Court rules stay at home and mandatory closures unconstitutional

Federal Court rules stay at home and mandatory closures unconstitutional. Federal Court Holds Stay-at-Home Orders Mandatory Business Closures Unconstitutional

For six months, Americans in 43 states have lived under unprecedented executive orders restricting freedoms as basic as whether they can work, leave their homes, and expose their faces in public. These mandates are not duly enacted laws — they are orders issued by one of the three branches of government. They constitute a system of one-person rule — something none of us expected could ever happen in the United States — and no one, apart from the 43 newfound state dictators, is sure when it will expire.

Today, after six months of this, a Pennsylvania Federal Court in Butler County v. Wolf reviewed the indefinite “emergency” restrictions imposed by the executive branch of Pennsylvania government, declaring limitations on gathering size, “stay-at-home orders,” and mandatory business closures unconstitutional. Refusing to accept the alleged need for a “new normal,” the Court stated that an “independent judiciary [is needed] to serve as a check on the exercise of emergency government power.”

About time. The Judicial Branch is coming to save us.

The Judicial Branch exists to check Executive authority even in times of emergency.

Abraham Lincoln once said, “Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” In 2020, sad to say, there are numerous governors across this nation who have perverted the Constitution — New Jersey’s Phil Murphy even declared its interpretation “above his pay grade” — with unprecedented orders restricting Americans’ rights to peaceably assemble, practice their religions, earn a living, travel freely, engage in commerce, and even manage their own health and exposure to risk. While global pandemics pose challenges for governors — particularly when the population is panicked by a hysterical mass media — entire populations cannot be indefinitely subjected to tyranny and deprived of fundamental rights and liberties. As the Court said today:

“There is no question that our founders abhorred the concept of one-person rule. They decried government by fiat. Absent a robust system of checks and balances, the guarantees of liberty set forth in the Constitution are just ink on parchment.”

We cannot allow our freedom to become “ink on parchment.” Many of our governors seek to do just that — they won’t even designate an endpoint to their “emergency” powers. When does the “emergency” end? This should be easy to say — X number of deaths per million, X number of deaths over X number of weeks — yet they will not say it. They want us to live under the constant threat of house arrest and livelihood deprivation, even though all we ever agreed to was a two-week effort to “flatten the curve.” We never agreed to an indefinite or permanent “new normal,” or to do whatever our wise governor dreams up and declares necessary to “eliminate infections.”

“In times of crisis, even a vigilant public may let down its guard over its constitutional liberties only to find that liberties, once relinquished, are hard to recoup and that restrictions — while expedient in the face of an emergency situation — may persist long after immediate danger has passed.”

Thank you, Judge Stickman, for recognizing our predicament, and for taking the first step towards restoring our freedom today by reminding those with authoritarian leanings that “governors cannot be given carte blanche to disregard the Constitution for as long as the medical problem persists.” The response to an emergency cannot undermine our system of constitutional liberties, or the system of checks and balances protecting those liberties. Liberty before “governor-guaranteed safety” — this is the American way, famously stated by Benjamin Franklin: “Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

“Stay-at-home orders” are so draconian as to be presumptively unconstitutional.

Substantive due process is “a recognition that the government may not infringe upon certain freedoms enjoyed by the people as a component of a system of ordered liberty.” Plaintiffs in Butler County v. Wolf argued that the governor’s “stay-at-home order” violated substantive due process in restricting intrastate travel and freedom of movement in a manner that exceeded legitimate government need and authority. Incredibly, Governor Wolf responded that his stay-at-home orders are “not actually orders at all, but merely recommendations,” and that they are constitutional because they do not “shock the conscience.” I’m willing to bet that Pennsylvania citizens would beg to differ.

In analyzing the constitutionality of “lockdowns,” the Court first traced the origin of the concept to its source — Wuhan, China — and recognized that population-wide lockdowns are “unprecedented in American law.” Even during the Spanish Flu, the deadliest pandemic in history by far, “nothing remotely approximating lockdowns were imposed.” Although the United States has faced many epidemics and pandemics, “there have never previously been lockdowns of entire populations — much less for lengthy and indefinite periods of time.” Quarantines are legally recognized, but refer to the isolation of sick people and those known to have been directly exposed to sick people. They are statutorily limited to the duration of the incubation period of the disease — a period which Governor Wolf’s “lockdown” plainly exceeded.

Not only have lockdowns never been imposed in American history, but they are not even mentioned in recent pandemic management guidance offered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”). In its 2017 guidelines for managing pandemics, the CDC recommends numerous protective measures such as hand washing, limited-duration school closures, and cancellations of mass gatherings, but nothing “even approximating the imposition of statewide (or even community-wide) stay at home orders or the closure of all [‘non-essential’] businesses.” Even for pandemics of “Very High Severity,” the CDC recommends only voluntary isolation of sick persons and their household members. “This is a far, far cry from a statewide lockdown such as the one imposed by [Governor Wolf’s] stay-at-home order.”

The Court speculates that United States lockdowns were imposed due to a “domino effect” instigated by China, a nation “unconstrained by concern for civil liberties and constitutional norms.” In the United States, by contrast, the default concept is liberty of movement. Our government has never before dreamt of implementing mandatory house arrest, no matter the threat — it has always used far less restrictive, voluntary means to manage pandemics, similar to those used by Sweden during COVID19. (Notably, Sweden has lower per-capita mortality for weeks 1-33 of 2020 than it did for weeks 1-33 of 2015 — a far better mortality outcome than heavily locked-down U.S. States such as NJ, NY, and MI).

Ultimately, the Court concludes that lockdowns are so draconian that they are nearly “presumptively unconstitutional”:

“The stay-at-home components of Defendant’s orders were and are unconstitutional. Broad population-wide lockdowns are such a dramatic inversion of the concept of liberty in a free society as to be nearly presumptively unconstitutional unless the government can truly demonstrate that they burden no more liberty than is reasonably necessary to achieve an important government end. The draconian nature of lockdown may render this a high bar, indeed.”

This bears repeating: the burden of proof that “lockdown” is absolutely crucial to achieve a scientifically-substantiated goal rests with the government. The burden does not rest with the people to disprove the necessity of lockdown. Liberty is the default!

Mandatory business closures violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee that every citizen may support himself in an occupation of his choosing.

Mandatory business closures, like “stay-at-home” orders, are utterly unprecedented in American law. There is not even any historical jurisprudence for the Court to consider in its analysis of the issue — a rare event, indeed.

“Never before has the government exercised such vast and immediate power over every business, business owner, and employee. Never before has the government taken a direct action which shuttered so many businesses and sidelined so many employees and rendered their ability to operate, and to work, solely dependent on government discretion.”

While playing with people’s lives and livelihoods, Governor Wolf and his task force never even bothered to put a definition in writing of what constitutes a “life-sustaining” business. Rather, the entire concept remained in flux, subject to executive whim. The Court held that this fast and loose system — still in place six months after the effort to “flatten the curve” was supposed to end — violates the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees every citizen the right to support himself by pursuing a chosen occupation.

“A total shutdown of business with no end-date and with the specter of additional, future shutdowns can cause critical damage to a business’s ability to survive, to an employee’s ability to support him/herself, and adds a government-induced cloud of uncertainty to the usual unpredictability of nature and life.”

It is truly incredible that Americans who worked their entire lives to build up businesses were instantly forced to lock their doors, go home, and deplete their emergency funds while they awaited the day their monarch should declare that “the world is safe for boutique shopping/plumbing work/haircuts again.” The impact of this shutdown on businesses was immediate and severe— it left the Butler County v. Wolf plaintiffs and many others “financially devastated” within weeks. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were lost, entire emergency funds were depleted, and perhaps worst of all, each business owner now lives under the cloud of the next indefinite “shutdown” edict. The Court found this system to be “so arbitrary in creation, scope, and administration as to fail constitutional scrutiny.” It is a blatant violation of basic human rights for an executive’s policy team to arbitrarily “apply their common sense” to people’s lives.

“Defendants were exercising raw governmental authority in a way that could (and did) critically wound and destroy the livelihoods of so many. The people of [Pennsylvania] at least deserved an objective plan, the ability to determine with certainty how the critical classifications were to be made, and a mechanism to challenge an alleged misclassification. The arbitrary design, implementation, and administration of the business shutdowns deprived the Business Plaintiffs and their fellow citizens of all three.”

The Court found particularly offensive the fact that some businesses were forced to close although they sold the same products and services as larger businesses that were allowed to remain open. One Plaintiff, a small business appliance and furniture store, was forced to close, while his corporate competitors at Lowe’s, Wal-Mart, and Home Depot were allowed to remain open. This nonsensical, obviously unjust mandate flies in the face of the stated goal of “managing contagion”: “It is paradoxical that in an effort to keep people apart, Defendants’ business closure orders permitted to remain in business the largest retailers with the highest occupancy limits.”

Paradoxical, indeed. The government, in issuing these orders, was “playing God,” determining who could work and who could not, who would profit and who would deplete reserves, who would receive a paycheck and who would join the unemployment line. An economy is not “a machine that can be shut down and restarted at will by government. It is an organic system made up of free people each pursuing their dreams.” This is not nothing. This is everything. The deprivation of the right to work, with no recourse — while others are permitted to work — is a crime against humanity. It is unconstitutional in the United States of America.

“Even in an emergency, the authority of government is not unfettered. The liberties protected by the Constitution are not fair-weather freedoms — in place when times are good but able to be cast aside in times of trouble. There is no question that this country has faced, and will face, emergencies of every sort. But the solution to a national crisis can never be permitted to supersede the commitment to individual liberty that stands as the foundation of the American experiment. The Constitution cannot accept the concept of a ‘new normal’ where the basic liberties of the people can be subordinated to open-ended emergency mitigation measures. Rather, the Constitution sets certain lines that may not be crossed, even in an emergency. Actions taken by Defendants crossed those lines. It is the duty of the Court to declare those actions unconstitutional.”

Thank heaven for the judicial branch — for checks and balances. The Founding Fathers knew what they were doing. John Adams: “power should never be trusted without a check.” James Madison: “you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” It’s been six months coming, but this brilliant machine is finally grinding back to life. Orders like Judge Stickman’s today remind the American people that they are not, actually, legally governed by fifty individual dictators, each empowered to declare at whim unlimited “emergencies” restricting basic, unalienable rights. No, we are not that. We are a government by the people, for the people, and of the people. We must — we will — work together, using the courts, to ensure that our elected officials never again forget this fact.

Stacey Rudin

Auhor: Stacey Rudin is a writer, activist, community leader, volunteer, and former litigator active in the grassroots movement to ensure future pandemics are managed in accordance with established public health guidelines. An avid tennis player and reader, Stacey lives in Short Hills, New Jersey. Read more from Stacey Rudin on Medium.

Read full article on AIER



Did you like it? Share your thoughts!

Share your thoughts on this article!

Source or Author Info
Founded in 1933, the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) is one of the oldest and most respected nonpartisan economic research and advocacy organizations in the country. With a global reach and influence, AIER is dedicated to developing and promoting the ideas of pure freedom and private governance by combining advanced economic research with accessible media outreach and educational programming to cultivate a better, broader understanding of the fundamental principles that enable peace and prosperity around the world.

Cultural Marxism

utah blm founder us flag a hate symbol

Utah BLM Founder: US Flag a Hate Symbol

THE EPOCH TIMES
Utah BLM Founder: US Flag a "Hate" Symbol. In a Facebook post made on Independence Day, Utah’s Black Lives Matter (BLM) Chapter wrote that the American flag is “a symbol of hatred” and those flying are “racist.” “When we Black Americans see this flag, we know the person flying it is not safe to be around,” the post… Read full article
hungary pm eu promoting transgender colonialism

Hungary PM: EU Promoting 'Transgender Colonialism'

NEON NETTLE
Hungary PM: EU Promoting 'Transgender Colonialism'. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán slams EU leaders for meddling in new laws. Hungary's populist Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has warned that transgender "colonialism" is threatening the way of life for his people. PM Orbán slammed European Union (EU) leaders as… Read full article

Black Father Demolishes Critical Race Theory by Asking One Question

TRENDING POLITICS
Black Father Demolishes Critical Race Theory by Asking One Question: "How Do I Have Two Medical Degrees If I’m Sitting Here Oppressed?" Ty Smith, a father of two teenagers and the star of a popular YouTube channel, disposed of the incendiary Critical Race Theory agenda at a meeting about the Bloomington Public Schools… Read full article

Sen Cotton Confronts Military With Dangers of Critical Race Theory

One America News Network
Sen Cotton Confronts Military With Dangers of Critical Race Theory and warns of serious consequences if military applies focus on CRT. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) has continued to push back on critical race theory being worked into military training. In an interview on Friday, Cotton discussed the letters he has received… Read full article

Socialist War in US

Popular in Pandemia

Your Government is Lying to You Covid19

Former Pfizer VP: Your Gov't is Lying to You

Former Pfizer VP: Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death. Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and…
Coronaphobia is more dangerous than virus

Coronaphobia is more dangerous than virus

Coronaphobia is more dangerous than virus. We Need a Principled Anti-Lockdown Movement Shell-shocked is a good way to describe the mood in the U.S. for a good part of the Spring of 2020. Most of us never thought it could happen here. I certainly did not, even…
Report challenges Fauci's lockdown theories

Report challenges Fauci's lockdown theories

Report challenges Fauci's lockdown theories. Fact-Checking Fauci, the primary architect of the Trump administration’s COVID response, painted a bleak picture about the EEUU's ability to contain the pandemic. In recent congressional testimony Dr. Anthony…
More than 300K veterans died as result of Obama Biden negligence

More than 300K veterans died as result of Obama/Biden negligence

More than 300K veterans died as result of Obama/Biden negligence. This Obama-Biden Administration Failure Killed More Americans Than COVID-19. Everyone on the left is trying to blame Donald Trump for COVID-19 and the deaths caused by it. Gov. Andrew Cuomo is…
Left lies about coronavirus Nancy Pelos Chuck Schume

The left lies about coronavirus

The left lies about coronavirus. BEWARE: Democrats Are Pushing These Four COVID-19 Lies. Beware of three widely circulating COVID-19-related lies and the partisan motives behind them. These lies are dangerous to your children and how you cope with this virus.…
16K doctors scientists oppose 2nd covid lockdown

16K doctors/scientists oppose 2nd covid lockdown

16K doctors/scientists oppose 2nd covid lockdown. They believe lockdown measures are not only completely unnecessary, but also have a devastating impact on physical and mental health as well as society. The Facts: More than 16000 scientists and doctors, as…
Joe Biden Restart Funding to Shady Wuhan Lab

Did Joe Biden Restart Funding to Shady Wuhan Lab?

Did Joe Biden Restart Funding to Shady Wuhan Lab?. President Biden has committed to providing the WHO with $200 million in US taxpayer dollars. Twitter is abuzz with rage this afternoon(February18) at reports that President Joe Biden has restarted funding to…
Recover Better Together: Taiwan can help

Recover Better Together: Taiwan can help

Recover Better Together: Taiwan can help. With fewer than 500 confirmed cases and 7 deaths, Taiwan has defied predictions and successfully contained COVID-19. Said Jaushieh Joseph Wu Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China (Taiwan). The UN must…
Death Certificates May be Edited Covid19

Death Certificates May be Edited for Covid

++ Death Certificates May be Edited for Covid. Funeral aid program allows death certificates to be altered for those who 'may have' died of COVID. Relatives of individuals who died in the "early days" of the coronavirus pandemic will be able to seek amended…
Trump Blames FDA Deep State for Coronavirus Vaccine Delay

Trump Blames FDA 'Deep State' for Coronavirus Vaccine Delay

President Donald Trump on Saturday accused the “deep state” in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of delaying a vaccine for the coronavirus. “The deep state, or whoever, over at the FDA is making it very difficult for drug companies to get people in…
baby vaccine

The price of one-sided Rx

The price of one-sided Rx. Which Diseases Are on the Rise As We Fight COVID-19? The battle against COVID-19 has been a grand and tragic balancing act. The battle against COVID-19 has been a grand and tragic balancing act. Reopening countries prematurely, the…
YouTube censors Ron Paul for questioning Fauci

YouTube censors Ron Paul for questioning Fauci

YouTube censors Ron Paul for questioning Fauci. YouTube has censored a video from former congressman Ron Paul, known for his trailblazing presidential campaigns against the Republican establishment in 2008 and 2012. Paul, who is a medical doctor, was censored…
Lockdowns The Rx is worse than the ailment

Lockdowns: The Rx is worse than the ailment

Lockdowns: The Rx is worse than the ailment. The Covid-19 Catastrophe. The lockdowns didn’t just cost millions of people’s livelihoods, they also cost people’s lives. It has been five months since the American people were told they would be under house arrest…
Doubts and concerns about chinese vaccines

Doubts and concerns about chinese vaccines

Doubts and concerns about Chinese vaccines. Chinese health authorities have approved three coronavirus vaccines (developed by Chinese state-owned enterprises, Sinopharm, Sinovac and CanSino Biologics) despite not having published the results of Phase 3, a…
Chinese virologist covid virus man Made in China

Chinese virologist: "covid virus man-Made in China"

Chinese virologist: "covid virus man-Made in China". Chinese virologist who fled to the US after claiming Beijing covered up Covid-19 vows to publish evidence PROVING the virus is manmade - and claims even non-scientists will be able to verify the data.…

Subscribe to The CubanAmerican Voice

Discover the news hidden and manipulated by the media!

Follow Us:

Facebook