- Julio M. Shiling
Castro-Communism’s Decomposition.
NON-DEMOCRATIC regimes base their ability on maintaining societal compliance, predicated mostly on one of two premises. The first is legitimation stemming from performance and results. The other is sheer brute repressive force. Totalitarian models are particularly inclined to need comprehensive schemes of social control, opposition inefficacy, and power arrangements that serve those ends. Communist Cuba never obtained legitimacy to govern based on performance-generated mass support. Authority has come, since 1959, through the leviathan of terror. The consistent string of public demonstrations on the island, since last summer, are palpable signs that Castro-Communism is decomposing.
The Cuban people have energetically challenged Marxist tyranny from the onset of the country’s totalitarian turn. Historically, this war of liberation has been, both, violent and non-violent. The U. S. has been, at times, an ally in that fight. Communist penetration of American institutions, particularly seats of political power, however, have proved to be detrimental to both nations. Spies and fellow travelers quite often depicted an inaccurate picture of Castroism’s nature and its threat to the Western Hemisphere. Consequently, America has not been morally consistent or logistically reliable in the cause for Cuba’s freedom.
Continue Reading …Castro-Communism’s Decomposition