The CubanAmerican Voice®

The Poison of Identity Politics

The Poison of Identity PoliticsThe Poison of Identity Politics.

If the task is to lessen racial prejudices and alleviate disheartening statistics of poverty, income, fatherless families and crime within black American communities, the focus needs to change.

Francis Key Scott, the author of the poem used as the lyrics for the national anthem of the United States, “The Star-Spangled Banner”, would be appalled to hear how this patriotic song depicting the success of the United States during the Battle of Baltimore in the War of 1812, was demoted recently in the Michigan State capitol before the Electoral College proceedings.

The anthem as identity politics

The Michigan State Senate found it fitting to play, both the country’s national anthem and the Black National Anthem, “Lift Every Voice”. The notion of equating these two anthems, debases many principles, chiefly being the doctrine of equality. 

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Black National Anthem Sung At Michigan Electoral College VoteA price so great as a brutal civil war to end slavery and uphold the natural rights of all citizens, the passing of the Reconstruction Amendments (13th, 14th, 15th) to the Constitution within the following five years (1865-1870) to solidify emancipation and the fundamental passage of seminal civil rights legislation to ameliorate imperfections a hundred years later (1964), all pointed to one thing: the continuing intent of building a color-blind, free society. What was witnessed on Monday, December 14th in Michigan, points exactly in the other direction. The promotion, in fact, of inequality and arguably black supremacy. There is, however, a far more venomous impact that this apparently harmless incident displays.

The State of Michigan has not been alone in coalescing behind this trend. The National Football League (NFL), since the season opened, has made it a point to play the colloquially termed black national anthem at the start of its games. This has prompted many to suggest, and rightfully so, that this is counterproductive to the challenges of fighting racial prejudice. Texas Senator Ted Cruz called this decision by the NFL as “asinine”, adding that it is one which deepens racial divisions.

The idea of organizing society along the context of groups of collective entities bound together by classifications such as ideology, religion, sex, self-perceived gender affiliations, class, etc., and all espousing subjective remedying proposals seeking “justice” for their victimhood follies, poison the very idea of a social compact in a democracy. This activity formulates a consciousness that renders a parallel reality where a person is not who one is as an individual, part of a family and a community which is a part of a society that exists within a nation. No, individual merits and sins are whitewashed and instead the person is embodied as part of an organic whole.   

A communitarian approach to plural societies is harmless, as it is limited to the private sphere such as trade associations, church groups, social clubs, or non-governmental organizations. The big difference between identity politics and a communitarian focus is that the former is ideologically driven and the other simply explains human manifestations within the existing order. Identity politics is inherently radical and apocalyptical. It’s raison d’être innately seeks to comprehensively deconstruct the prevailing system. It is a manifestation of a subversive and revolutionary worldview.

Epistemologically, identity politics rests on Marxism, specifically, Critical Theory. One can say identity politics is its direct effect, one which seeks to lose academic mumbo jumbo, but not its ideological substance. Marxism’s underlying premise of constant social conflict, in this case, explained in the cultural sphere, places the task of playing a black national anthem, not as an African American pride celebration, but rather as an inward move against “white privilege” in its war for political power. Totally consistent with Critical Theory, in this case, Critical Race Theory, it is a call to arms against the perceived oppressors.    

If the task is to lessen racial prejudices and alleviate disheartening statistics of poverty, income, fatherless families and crime within black American communities, the focus needs to change. Statist policies have impoverished blacks and the advancement of Critical Race Theory’s Marxist agenda will only exacerbate social divisions and foster inequality and bigotry. A nation has only one national anthem. In America’s case, it is the “The Star-Spangled Banner” and it belongs to all.

©The Cuban American Voice. Originally published in @El American. All rights reserved.

🖋️Author Julio M. Shiling

J M Shiling Author circle red blue🖋️Author Julio M. Shiling 
Julio M. Shiling is a political scientist, writer, columnist, lecturer, media commentator, and director of Patria de Martí and The CubanAmerican Voice. He holds a master’s degree in Political Science from Florida International University (FIU) in Miami, Florida. He is a member of The American Political Science Association and The PEN Club (Cuban Writers in Exile Chapter).

        📚Published books   📺In the media   👨‍🏫 Conferences and Symposiums    🎙️Podcast The Shiling Summary

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Cuba’s Influence in American Academia

Cuba’s Influence in American Academia. Leer en Español To accurately fathom the success of the Castro-Communist regime[1] in Cuba, as measured by its ability to fructuously withstand the pressures for democratic[2] liberalization and persevere in...

The real reason why Hispanics voted for Trump

The real reason why Hispanics voted for Trump. The 2020 US presidential election has not yet been officially decided. Some things, though, are indisputable and already a matter of truth. A big surprise for many was the fact that a staggering and sur...

Trump, Hamilton and State Legislatures

Trump, Hamilton and State Legislatures. Trump, by insisting on going to the courts and, above all, to the state legislatures, to denounce the fraud in these elections with abundant evidence, is defending democratic institutions Alexander Hamilton n...

New Right or Trumpism?

New Right or Trumpism?A New Right had been forming before, and increasingly since 2016. Broadly speaking, it is soundly Conservative with Classical Liberal undertones in the economic sphere. “Trumpism” is a concept commonly being tossed around these...

A 2021 Contested Election?

A 2021 Contested Election? The matter of a contested election is not a novelty in American politics. It must be emphasized, however, that not all contested electoral processes have qualified for a contested election. Donald J. Trump could join the ...