The CubanAmerican Voice®

D.C. Statehood Betrays the Intent of America’s Founding Fathers

D.C. Statehood Betrays the Intent of America’s Founding FathersD.C. Statehood Betrays the Intent of America’s Founding Fathers.

The left, completely in control of the Democratic Party and in perfect unison with mass media, Big Tech and the woke corporate conglomerates, is aggressively doing everything possible to make America into a one-party, authoritarian state.

The Biden government, acquiring every day more characteristics of a regime than of a presidency, is the ideal vehicle for leftism to make the United States less free and more in the image of 21st-century socialism. The latest front in this liberticide endeavor is the proposal to appropriate two permanent Senate memberships seats to the Democrat’s tally. 

On Monday, March 22nd, the House Oversight Committee held a hearing on the issue for granting the District of Columbia (District) statehood and officially motorized the H.R. 51, also known as the Washington, D.C. Admission Act, into legislative action. The Senate has a companion version, S.B. 51. This is not the first attempt at affording the home of the nation’s capital the status of being a state. In fact, this has been an ongoing campaign, on the part of Democrats, to garner statehood for the District and tactfully pick up two senate seats and one for the lower chamber. All previous attempts have failed. 

Subscribe to our Newsletter

This time, the left is going all out and spearheading this charge by amplifying its claims for statehood legitimacy premised on perceived civil rights discrimination and “social justice” grievance claims that are underlined by Critical Race Theory (CRT). This point has been clearly established by some proponents like Stasha Rhodes, campaign manager for the movement 51 for 51, a DC state advocacy group. “From our perspective”, cites Rhodes, “leaving 700,000 mostly Black and brown residents without a vote in Congress is racism.”  “This is an injustice”, she added, “and honestly, a stain on American democracy.”

“True to the core of leftism and Barack Obama’s Democratic Party, the move to make America socialist is functionally embedded in this grotesque scheme structured to annul the Framer’s design of the American Republic”. (EFE)

The cultural Marxist CRT punch line blazing the District statehood rationale could not be passed up by the left, given all the dividends that Black Lives Matter, Antifa and other communist insurrectionists have gained from the CRT diatribe. 

Federalist No. 43, penned by James Madison, made clear the Framer’s logic for establishing the nation’s capital within a territorial realm of autonomy, not conflicted with a state’s interests. The business of carrying out the functions of the federal government was not to be entangled with the intricacies of any particular state. Madison reflected the will and collective wisdom of the Founding Fathers on this point.

The “representation” factor for District residents was clearly contemplated, by the Federalist co-writer (along with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay) and subsequent 4th president, to have been satisfactorily met by the proximity of the District’s inhabitants to Congress and the office of the President. The left’s “no taxation without representation” argument for the District’s residents is folly and downplays the Framer’s sagacity on this issue. The fact that two states, Maryland and Virginia, ceded territory in 1790 to the federal government so that the District could be founded, adds prescience to the needed separation of legal status between a state and the nation’s capital.

The clarity offered in the Federalist Papers solidly contradicts the left’s pretense for District statehood. Additionally, the Constitution presents a host of hurdles to the Democratic dream of obtaining a de facto lifetime two-member appointment to the Senate. Article I, Section 8, grants Congress with oversight responsibilities for the District. There would be an issue of a constitutional abrogation of power, if the District were to acquire state status.  The 23rd Amendment is another obstacle for the Democrats. This 1961 addition to the Constitution delineated greater specificity to the District’s legal condition and the rights of its residents. The notion of the District becoming a state seems constitutionally unfeasible if the 23rd Amendment stands.  

Rasmussen Reports conducted a poll between February 22nd and 23rd and it found that 55% of Americans oppose statehood for the District. This reflects a historic pattern that appears to conclude that the conversion of the nation’s capital into a state does not enjoyed popular support. Left-wing support NGO’s, like Data for Progress and Democracy for All 2021 Action, have been lauding faux surveys alleging support for the District’s statehood. Such “polls”, however, lack credibility and convey a preset agenda promotion format.  

D.C. becoming a state is all about moving forward in the left’s confection for monolithic political control. True to the core of leftism and Barack Obama’s Democratic Party, the move to make America socialist is functionally embedded in this grotesque scheme structured to annul the Framer’s design of the American Republic. This is truly a war: the leftist elites versus the American people.

©The Cuban American Voice. Originally published in @El American. All rights reserved.

🖋️Author Julio M. Shiling

J M Shiling Author circle red blue🖋️Author Julio M. Shiling 
Julio M. Shiling is a political scientist, writer, columnist, lecturer, media commentator, and director of Patria de Martí and The CubanAmerican Voice. He holds a master’s degree in Political Science from Florida International University (FIU) in Miami, Florida. He is a member of The American Political Science Association and The PEN Club (Cuban Writers in Exile Chapter).

        📚Published books   📺In the media   👨‍🏫 Conferences and Symposiums    🎙️Podcast The Shiling Summary

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Julio Articles

Does the U.S. Have Political Prisoners? Leer en Español There is a consensus, for the most part, as to what constitutes a political prisoner. Ideological inclinations, however, often stand in the...

[Cotinue reading]

Why Are Cubans Going to Ukraine? Leer en Español Cuban soldiers and conscripts are officially present in the Eurasian region. Their mission is customary, given the role Cuban communism has played...

[Cotinue reading]

Criminalizing the U.S. Constitution Leer en Español The United States has a big problem. Its version of democracy is being deconstructed. Free speech, a prerequisite of democratic rule, is being...

[Cotinue reading]

Trump Indictment III: Free Speech and Fair Elections? Rigging an election is a form of theft, and there are many ways to achieve this. Leer en Español The latest indictment against former...

[Cotinue reading]

The Power of the Imponderable  "The 11th of July Popular Uprising (11J) of 2021 marked a watershed moment for the communist dictatorship in Cuba." Leer en Español Hannah Arendt argued that...

[Cotinue reading]

Dissecting the Trump Documents Indictment “No one is above the law” is a phrase that once had depth in the U.S. It has become a lame cliché Leer en Español Few who believe in a free society can...

[Cotinue reading]

The Cuba-China Espionage Nexus: New or Old? Leer en Español The use of alien elements to assist in Cuban communism’s longevity is old stuff. When will the U.S. and the West figure this out and...

[Cotinue reading]

Putting the Caimanera Protests into Context Leer en Español Maintaining political power by force is an art. It is not an ethical practice or an exercise of a moral task. Nonetheless, it is a chore...

[Cotinue reading]

Biden’s Rush to Rescue Castroism. Cuban communism (yes, a kleptocracy can be communist also) continues faithfully to exercise dictatorial pragmatism, a policy institutionalized in 1959. Sharp...

[Cotinue reading]

Cuba’s Influence in American Academia

Cuba’s Influence in American Academia. Leer en Español To accurately fathom the success of the Castro-Communist regime[1] in Cuba, as measured by its ability to fructuously withstand the pressures for democratic[2] liberalization and persevere in...

The real reason why Hispanics voted for Trump

The real reason why Hispanics voted for Trump. The 2020 US presidential election has not yet been officially decided. Some things, though, are indisputable and already a matter of truth. A big surprise for many was the fact that a staggering and sur...

Trump, Hamilton and State Legislatures

Trump, Hamilton and State Legislatures. Trump, by insisting on going to the courts and, above all, to the state legislatures, to denounce the fraud in these elections with abundant evidence, is defending democratic institutions Alexander Hamilton n...

New Right or Trumpism?

New Right or Trumpism?A New Right had been forming before, and increasingly since 2016. Broadly speaking, it is soundly Conservative with Classical Liberal undertones in the economic sphere. “Trumpism” is a concept commonly being tossed around these...